You realize there are US government agencies who think it was a lab leak, right?. Granted, the agencies have "low confidence" whichever way they come down on the issue. Are they conspiracy theorists too?
I understand there are intelligence agencies who have said they think it’s possible or likely.
Not aware of any credible scientific agencies who believe that, as the lying scientists stated clearly under oath.
I already said a lab leak is possible, but until there’s some evidence of that it’s nothing more than a conspiracy theory. All of the evidence has pointed scientists - even scientists who thought originally that a lab leak was likely - to it being much more likely to be natural. As, again, they stated very clearly under oath.
If you believe these hearings were anything other than blatant political grandstanding meant to undermine the scientific community that one political party has villainized for years, you’re more gullible than I’ve been giving you credit for. I’ll trust the scientists, not the politicians who have made it exceedingly clear they are not operating in good faith here. When there’s evidence indicating a lab leak is more likely then obviously it’s worth discussing but right now the evidence clearly points the other way, according to the people who study this stuff professionally.
That’s what it really comes down to, right? Who do you trust more - the professional virologists or the politicians who deemed it a “cover up” before the hearing even started and have made total fools of themselves over and over? Mn has made it clear which he trusts more, as have I - how about you?