Nobody is saying that.
Spark is. He says 8 teams all “passed on him too,” not taking need or risk into the equation.
Half of these teams at least were not taking Carter. Even before the accident.
The other half took the best player in the draft at their position with exception to the Raiders going with a guy thought to have as high of a ceiling as any player in the draft (without the character concerns).
Once Carter fell to 9 he was far and away the top talent left. Some people were saying Bijan Robinson was the best player in the draft, period. Once we were sitting at 9 with the Bears the obvious choice talent/scheme/need wise was Carter. The same can’t be said for all of the previous 8 teams.
Half of those teams weren’t taking him no matter what. So, yeah, putting more of the microscope on the Bears regarding Carter is reasonably fair. Some professional mockers had Carter to the Bears at 1 (before the trade). That was never going to be the case once Charlotte traded up. They didn’t trade to to draft Jalen Carter.
Two reasons this position doesn’t hold water:
1) Carter was never the CLEAR best player in the draft (though he was right there with Anderson)
2) At least 3 teams were going QB no matter what. From there it was just best player at a premium position and risk evaluation. That is a sliding table that has moved pretty considerably once you get to the 9th pick.
I’m guessing Seattle feels pretty good about their decision to take the best CB in the draft. And Arizona probably feels pretty good about trying to make sure Kyler Murray has every chance to resurrect his career by giving him a LT, the first one off the board. There were no “1st/best player at a premium position” left once we got to 9.