Spark, the issue was Fauci and the other scientists in the White House getting up and not telling us that the N95 masks were the ones to get because they wanted to save them for the first responders.
Oh? Just a minute ago it was about neck gaiters, I guess until the evidence undercut that.
I don't have any issue with hording the best masks for the people who were on the front lines and consistently exposed to the virus. That's what any logical assessment would suggest, I assume. I never had trouble getting a mask, personally.
So now we've got, in terms of what sows distrust in science:
- they said to wear neck gaiters when they don't work, even though the evidence says they do work
- they saved the most effective masks for the people most likely to be exposed to COVID
I'm struggling to find the yarn you're trying to spin here. It seems like you're looking for some way that the scientists - and not the people who have been actively trying to undermine them for years - are the ones sowing distrust in science, but your examples are extraordinarily bad.
I think the biggest things by a hundred miles that sow distrust in science are people who misrepresent scientific studies, and people who outright tell people not to trust scientists for political reasons. It's not a coincidence that the largest distrusters of science are the people being actively told "don't trust scientists, they're bribed to lie to you". This hearing has done infinitely more to sow distrust in the scientific establishment than someone telling you to wear a neck gaiter, or the national health apparatus holding back effective masks for the people most likely to be exposed to the virus.