One guy had better receivers. Sure. But both had plenty of offensive talent around them. And one guy played Clemson twice and Alabama once. One guy didn’t. Did Caleb ever play in a really important game?
Does the level of talent around them count in this comparison, or is it completely because of Fields OSU was in those games and because of Williams that USC isn’t?
Looks like the “biggest” games Williams has played were:
- the Alamo Bowl vs #15 Oregon at Oklahoma:
78% completion, 242 yards passing, 3 TD, 0 INT
- the Pac-12 title game against #12 Utah as a junior:
68.3% completion, 363 yards, 3 TD 1 INT
- the Cotton Bowl against #14 Tulane as a junior:
71.2% completion, 462 yards, 5 TD, 1 INT.
At the end of the day it’s a question mark like every NFL pick ever has been, no doubt about that - but I can’t really take anybody seriously who says both “I haven’t watched him” and also “he’s a smaller Justin Fields”. He may not end up nearly as good as Fields, I can’t say for sure, but they’re not really similar players at all. The ONLY reason that “evaluation” exists is because the Bears have the top pick.