Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 06, 2025, 01:46:41 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 141
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 163869
  • Total Topics: 1379
  • Online Today: 373
  • Online Ever: 4316
  • (October 16, 2025, 04:40:42 PM)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 156
Total: 158

2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)

  • 1208 Replies
  • 58632 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 29205
  • +577/-2356
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #330 on: May 10, 2023, 03:50:45 PM »
Why would I waste time pondering schedule times and flex possibilities?

Is this a bit?
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #331 on: May 10, 2023, 03:50:58 PM »
I waste enough time here and playing golf on my phone. That’s more than enough time wasting.
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

spark mandrill

  • *****
  • 4040
  • +312/-40
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #332 on: May 10, 2023, 03:59:51 PM »
TBF, you posted an article earlier today about ESPN's stat projections for the upcoming NFL season.  How would anyone know "analyzing the schedule" is where the line is drawn?

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #333 on: May 10, 2023, 05:33:19 PM »
TBF, you posted an article earlier today about ESPN's stat projections for the upcoming NFL season.  How would anyone know "analyzing the schedule" is where the line is drawn?

It was someone else’s work. I just read it (quickly) and posted it. Why the fuck would I ponder start times and flex possibilities? In May, no less.
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #334 on: May 10, 2023, 05:34:06 PM »
Stats are a very different thing from start times. When the Bears play, I will likely be watching. That’s all I know.
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 29205
  • +577/-2356
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #335 on: May 10, 2023, 10:01:38 PM »
In May, no less.

You could say that about a few articles posted in this thread.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #336 on: May 11, 2023, 09:21:11 AM »
You could say that about a few articles posted in this thread.

We’re talking start times here. Literally the least important and interesting part of the season.
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

spark mandrill

  • *****
  • 4040
  • +312/-40
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #337 on: May 11, 2023, 10:21:26 AM »
It was someone else’s work. I just read it (quickly) and posted it. Why the fuck would I ponder start times and flex possibilities? In May, no less.

IDK, why would you care about ESPN's stat projections 4 months before the season starts?

Nobody knows why you ponder the things you do.

*

spark mandrill

  • *****
  • 4040
  • +312/-40
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #338 on: May 11, 2023, 10:21:47 AM »
Stats are a very different thing from start times. When the Bears play, I will likely be watching. That’s all I know.

Sure.  There were no real stats in the article, though.

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #339 on: May 11, 2023, 10:33:31 AM »
IDK, why would you care about ESPN's stat projections 4 months before the season starts?

Nobody knows why you ponder the things you do.

Ponder? It was an article I perused. I don’t even recall what it said. Who on gods green earth gives a shit about start times (or would spend time trying to guess them) over stats in the age of analytics?
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #340 on: May 11, 2023, 10:35:14 AM »
These aren’t “stats?”

Clay’s numbers have Fields going for 3,173 passing yards and 22 passing TDs to go along with 909 (!) rushing yards and 6 ground scores.
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #341 on: May 11, 2023, 10:36:14 AM »
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #342 on: May 11, 2023, 10:38:06 AM »
Why would I spend 45 seconds perusing an article on Justin Fields’ stat projections instead of trying to guess start times? Why, we’ll never know…
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

KKKustard

  • *****
  • 35356
  • +940/-935
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #343 on: May 11, 2023, 10:42:48 AM »
45 seconds is probably an overestimation of how long I spent “pondering” that article.
I’d prefer not to vote for Catholics either. But I’d still take them over the Muslims.

You all want diversity but white people are like 7% of the population of the world and account for the vast majority of innovation

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 29205
  • +577/-2356
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: 2023 Chicago Bears thread (new)
« Reply #344 on: May 11, 2023, 10:46:38 AM »
We’re talking start times here. Literally the least important and interesting part of the season.

Bear record on Monday night has been historically bad, hasn't it?
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"