You’re using pseudo logic to explain away our problems. Having a 1st team All-American low post behemoth on your roster doesn’t cap your upside. I’d argue having small, not particularly extra-athletic streaky shooting, middling passing guards who aren’t particularly adept at getting themselves open against solid defense caps your upside more.
Your pseudo-intellectual basketball takes need to be called out more often. Sure, sounds great, because you can’t disprove it, and Kofi is an anomaly in the modern game; but it’s akin to the “the results speak for themselves” when Ayo was out. Kofi wasn’t ball dominant because he’s Kofi. He was ball dominant because we didn’t have more or equally reliable options.
It’s hilarious how you slap the “pseudo” on things you can’t comprehend.
No, having Kofi on our team doesn’t lower our ceiling.
Here’s what does: No one is going to come be a complimentary player (like a Trevion Williams type) knowing Kofi is an AA and going to play 30+ minutes and get most of the touches. So that lowers the ceiling for 10 mins/game when Kofi is out.
Then he’s huge and not quick down the floor so that limits transition opportunities.
And other teams with mobile bigs that can shoot can pull him away from the basket where he is a huge liability and can’t protect the rim.
And teams know he is no threat whatsoever if they can push him off the block so when he catches the ball 12-15 feet from the bucket they can swarm him and force a bad pass out of the double or triple team.
All of these issues lower the team’s ceiling for 30+ mins per game.
Sure if you pair him with a guy like Ayo or Ivey and a really good change of pace small ball 5 you’ve got something. Easier said than done.