All I know is that lately when talking about Belichick’s greatness you keep bringing up Brady, and what he’s done or not done without him. So what impression am I supposed to get? Why try to obfuscate? Be a little clearer. I think you’re a guy with integrity, live up to it.
I don't know how much clearer I could be.
I bring up Brady, and Belichick's mediocre record without him - as well as the Phil Jackson example - to show just how fucking stupid it is to say "Sure x won, but he had x great player/unit". It's dumb as fuck to try to separate a coach's record from his roster, and we don't even try to do that in most cases. If you go 3-13 a couple seasons in a row in the NFL you're almost certainly getting fired, even if you had a 0-16 roster. You could be the best game coach on Earth, get more out of your players than anyone, but coaches are judged by how much they win.
If Nagy doesn't win, he'll be fired and should be. If he does, he won't be fired and shouldn't be - even if he wins because he had a great defense. Having a good roster is not a knock against a coach and it's beyond dumb to act like it is when you're trying to make a coach look bad.
Yeah, Nagy inherited a great defense - undoubtedly. He also inherited an offense that had finished 29th in points and 30th in yardage the year before and hadn't finished inside the top-14 in either category in four straight seasons. I never hear you talk about that.