They had access to him. Which he admitted. Which you made a point no one would ever do. Jackass.
They did not have access to the evidence he presented in the court room. They interviewed him.
They didn't see the video, they didn't have the DNA report, they didn't interview the accuser, they didn't have the police report. And again, of course they didn't - that was evidence in an ongoing criminal trial. Didn't take a genius.
When you've gotta make some shit up and pretend to call someone else wrong, they probably weren't.