Do you really not see the difference between 12 years of data and 3 (one of which is severely tainted)?
How many times have I said “then limit it to three years?”
And your response is, well Stafford was hurt for a lot of his first three years.
And then I say “okay then limit it to 38 starts?”
And your response is to ignore those numbers and move on to what he did in year 4?
We’ve already played this game like 2-3 times today.
No matter how you slice it - Stafford’s whole career, his NFL service, his number of starts. Through this point Stafford was considerably better both in terms of production/numbers AND W/L record, if you believe that can be tied to a QB.