Feeding off your thought in the NW thread: Dain was a bad matchup and looked awful against Purdue last year so I’m thinking we really need Coleman to bring Edey outside, take good threes, and make 2-3 of them. He also has to stay out of foul trouble on the other end, which I fear is going to be an issue. Hopefully Dain has a better experience this time around.
Dainja should be in the game whenever Edey is not, to capitalize on his abilities. CoHawk can hopefully make a slimmer Edey play more on perimeter, should open up some back cuts (overplays), and wing slashes (Guerrier-Rodgers). If Edey gets into foul trouble, I actually think the remaining Purdue team is even less equipped to deal with CoHawk/Guerrier.
Potential scoring in order to beat Purdue at home will need to be around:
Domask - 20 pts or more, likely it will be around this as he can command alot of attention and get to the foul line, less than 4 turnovers overall.
Guerrier - 13-15 pts going against Furst/Heide/Grillis - 8 rebounds
CoHawk - 12-18 against Edey and Furst/Grillis, 5-10 rebounds
Harmon - 8 pts to 12 pts.
Goode - 3-4 3's and 5 rebounds
Rodgers - 8 pts-10 rebounds-less than 4 turnovers (handling the ball primarily).
Dainja - 5-10 pts with 5-8 rebounds if minutes are there.
This in theory would give us a low water point mark of 75 points and a high of nearly 100 once again. Defense will prevail as will the physicality of the B1G will creep in as well, so the low water mark might be the most expected outcome.
Purdue averages 85 pts per game, the ILLINI give up an average of 65 pts per game.
ILLINI average 84 pts per game, the Boilers give up an average of 67 pts per game.
Expect a game in the low-mid 70's, with Purdue winning by less than 5 imo at home.