Meanwhile, back in the real world, the rumors fly. It is duly noted Spark does not approve.
I don't think we need to worry about tainting a jury pool.
There are a few facts we do know with a strong likelihood based on The AD JW's comments, the released arrest warrant, and the police report.
I also think the public record pertaining to the background, rent conduct, and motives of the DA, and filing ADA are obviously relevant. District Judges will not even meet with the DA privately.
Others are free to disagree or think I am stupid.
It appears the 3 person panel has met. There is no timeline on making a decision.
Contrary to a published report, any decision is not final. The panel would meet again if relevant new information surfaces.