I was covering that Fields has had 2.5 years in the league (and you still claim more time is needed to evaluate him) and your "Mitch got 50 starts so should Fields"-type arguments.
I never said Fields “should get 50 starts.” I was making the case that it’s unfair that Mitch gets 50 while tons of people were wanting to launch Justin after 26. Or in your case, maybe 10.
I did feel Justin deserved at least the rest of this year. Most teams are not going to give up on a QB they’ve invested so much in only 2 years. Again, most. And before you present the 49ers, they don’t give up on Lance if they didn’t have Purdy. We don’t have a Brock Purdy.