I mean yes, hiring a new coach and within two years morphing from a team that made the tournament 3 times in a decade to one that made it (or would’ve) four straight years is something most reasonable people would be pleased with.
Our fanbase is largely unreasonable and entitled.
If you were a coach and you knew that the last guy had taken over a bad program, instantly resurrected it, and the entire fanbase turned on him pretty much right away - you’d probably think other schools were pretty appealing. You’re very likely to be fired here no matter how good your results are, unless you make the F4 every year. My guess is if Underwood made the F4 every year but didn’t win the title the same people would want him fired.
I think people overall were very positive about the trajectory and results. I especially thought the Covid year team was excellent coaching, adjustments, development, and roster creation. His best work by far anywhere. That was a very good team and I am pretty sure would have made it to second weekend.
The Loyola game, right or wrong, really was a kick in the nuts for the fanbase and a hit for UW and staff.
The next year was solid overall, but the tourney results were again disappointing and the team was not playing well by that time. They were on fumes mentally.
This year was a struggle though we made it in, but again, the tourney was not good, and the year was pretty chaotic managing culture. Nobody thought we could put two games in a row together.
I
do not think there is any chance UW is on hot seat right now. I do think if we do not get out of first weekend the next two years, he will be.
And that would be reasonable and most other top tier coaches would understand. He would then be 0-5 here and 0-9 overall getting to second weekend.
I hope we will break through. It will be 19 years since a S16 come next March.
I also think the fact that he was allegedly looking around tells me he will not stay if boosters start bitching too loudly.