Total Members Voted: 16
Voting closed: April 26, 2023, 11:18:32 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Again. I never ever ever ever ever said you “thought Trubisky was better than Mahomes.” So who is making shit up here?
You made the case they were playing about evenly and used stats to make the case. I said, you probably shouldn’t do that. Now…am I still “lying” here?
You claimed I said "Trubisky was pretty much on par with Mahomes". I did not. You are making shit up here.
You're intentionally leaving out the entire context of the conversation, but say whatever bullshit you want man. I'm done. Misrepresent away, you won't remember it tomorrow anyway.
Whatever “context” you care to use, it’s clear Mahomes is 20x the quarterback Mitch Trubisky is. So I’ll leave it at that.
You agreed with a lot more of them pre JFC.
I just think the differences have been more accentuated lately because there are only 5 or so hyper active posters here. While I thought Trubisky was a poor pick from the start and sucked, I understood Spark's arguments about sample size. Which is, ironically enough, somewhat your argument about JFC. And, at the end of the day, you may be right about him. I do not think he gets 2 years though. If he does not pick up the pace this year, I think they move on.
That’s about the gist of what I remembered. Whatever “words” or “phrase” was used, you used stats to say they were playing about equally. I said don’t believe the stats. Again, am I off base with this description of what happened?
Ironically, in year 2 of Trubisky they were trying to build around him. In Justin Fields’ case they were literally tearing down the roster. So maybe we shouldn’t call it apples to apples.
I never said they were. Just that you are using sample size, in addition to roster context and other things, as part of your argument.
Yeah. I made the case that maybe we should see what he looks like with a team that’s actually trying to win before we declare him a certain failure. You found that highly objectionable