Again. Good coaches “win,” anywhere. That’s largely true. I’m talking about winning at the highest levels. It is easier to do (though not “easy”) at Illinois than it is ASU. I don’t see how that’s controversial. We’ve had 3 HOF caliber coaches in our lifetime. I don’t think ASU has had one. I don’t think that’s a coincidence.
And that's why Illinois has historically better results than ASU. Because they have hired Hall of Fame coaches.
It's not because it's Illinois and ASU is ASU. It's because Illinois has hired better college basketball coaches, and good college basketball coaches win whether they're at Illinois or Iona or Kentucky or UMass.
You're arguing against your own point again. Good coaches win wherever they go. Mediocre coaches don't. Saying two coaches are comparable despite their results not being comparable because historically one program is better than the other simply ignores reality.