Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 09, 2026, 04:38:03 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 177035
  • Total Topics: 1487
  • Online Today: 446
  • Online Ever: 4316
  • (October 16, 2025, 04:40:42 PM)
Users Online
Users: 3
Guests: 156
Total: 159

No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!

  • 791 Replies
  • 12411 Views

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 39157
  • +1039/-1042
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #765 on: Today at 10:33:37 AM »
Yeah, they expect us to take this lady seriously 😂 …



I don’t think that’s her. But even if it was, so what?
Wanting America to be better is not America-hating, it’s patriotism.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 39157
  • +1039/-1042
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #766 on: Today at 10:34:06 AM »
What part rubbed you the wrong way, Judy? “Refuse fascism?”
Wanting America to be better is not America-hating, it’s patriotism.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 39157
  • +1039/-1042
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #767 on: Today at 10:48:32 AM »
If all I get is leftist propaganda in my feed, explain how I saw this.

https://x.com/ryptocrypto/status/2042149805804208211?s=46&t=taZJ_d5ITWr6Hq3PUZDUiQ
Wanting America to be better is not America-hating, it’s patriotism.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 39157
  • +1039/-1042
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #768 on: Today at 10:50:54 AM »
If all I get is leftist propaganda in my feed, explain how I saw this.

https://x.com/ryptocrypto/status/2042149805804208211?s=46&t=taZJ_d5ITWr6Hq3PUZDUiQ

My main problem with this theory is that rich people would benefit greatly. Your average American would not.
Wanting America to be better is not America-hating, it’s patriotism.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 39157
  • +1039/-1042
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #769 on: Today at 10:51:27 AM »
And Trump isn’t that clever. Although he’s very good at running scams. It’s his one area of genius.
Wanting America to be better is not America-hating, it’s patriotism.

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12474
  • +178/-2576
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #770 on: Today at 10:54:44 AM »
If all I get is leftist propaganda in my feed, explain how I saw this.

https://x.com/ryptocrypto/status/2042149805804208211?s=46&t=taZJ_d5ITWr6Hq3PUZDUiQ
This guy ?

Account based in
Europe

8 username changes
Last on March 2026
Connected via
Europe App Store

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12474
  • +178/-2576
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #771 on: Today at 10:56:03 AM »
I think Tempo might be a foreign agent.
😂😂

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 31278
  • +603/-2425
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #772 on: Today at 11:04:18 AM »
What part rubbed you the wrong way, Judy? “Refuse fascism?”

Maybe that she is a Libra?
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9125
  • +612/-2088
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #773 on: Today at 11:51:13 AM »
"SCIENCE IS NOT A LIBERAL CONSPIRACY!"
9:36 AM · Sep 10, 2021

She's probably correct. Wtf said science is a liberal conspiracy ?

While we can can quibble over semantics and I am sure you probably will, that is pretty much a core MAGA position.

“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12474
  • +178/-2576
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #774 on: Today at 12:05:58 PM »
While we can can quibble over semantics and I am sure you probably will, that is pretty much a core MAGA position.


Uh, ok. Whatever.

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9125
  • +612/-2088
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #775 on: Today at 12:22:23 PM »
Awake A 👁️

Recent polling and analysis from early 2026 indicate a significant, ongoing partisan divide in trust in science, with MAGA (Make America Great Again) supporters generally exhibiting higher skepticism toward scientific institutions, vaccines, and climate change consensus compared to the general population.

Trust in Science and Institutions

*Declining Trust: A 2026 report indicates that trust in federal health agencies like the CDC, FDA, and NIH has fallen among the general public during the second Trump administration, decreasing from 74%–76% in February 2024 to 60%–62% by February 2026.

*Partisan Divide: Data from 2022–2024 shows that while trust in science was relatively similar in the 1970s, it has polarized. By 2024, only 36% of Republicans expressed "a great deal" of trust in the scientific community, compared with 45% of Democrats.

*MAGA Perspective: MAGA supporters often exhibit distrust in expert-driven institutions and favor independent, non-governmental sources of information.

Vaccines and "MAHA" Movement

*MAHA Movement Skepticism: The "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) movement, aligned with MAGA supporters, holds high levels of skepticism toward vaccines.

*Vaccine Attitudes: A February 2026 poll found that 65% of MAHA respondents supported reducing the number of vaccines Americans receive, compared to 41% of the general population

*Policy Impact: MAHA-supporting parents are twice as likely as non-supporters to s okkip or delay vaccines for their children.

*Republicans report higher usage of non-evidence-based COVID-19 treatments like ivermectin.

Climate Change

*Partisan Divide: Climate science is a major area of polarization. A 2020 report found 87% of Democrats trusted climate scientists, compared to 56% of Republicans.

*MAGA Views: Studies show that supporters of Donald Trump are less likely than those who disapprove of him to agree that human activity drives climate change (50% vs. 79%, respectively).

*Scientific Consensus Disconnect: Conservative ideology and Trumpism have been linked to a higher likelihood of rejecting anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change, a trend that decreases with higher education.

Key Findings on Public Health Policies

*Vaccine Policy Changes: In February 2026, amid policy changes that reduced the number of diseases targeted by routine childhood vaccinations, trust in the CDC among the general public remained at a low level.

*Trusted Messengers: Despite the overall distrust, some studies found that using trusted messengers—such as seeing Donald Trump speak positively about vaccines—could increase vaccine acceptance among his supporters.
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12474
  • +178/-2576
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #776 on: Today at 12:43:56 PM »

AI

"Do maga supporters view science as a liberal conspiracy

Searching the web

71 results

Searching on X

15 results

No, MAGA supporters do not generally view science itself as a "liberal conspiracy." That framing is a common oversimplification pushed in partisan media, but it doesn't hold up under scrutiny of polling data, historical trends, or the actual critiques from many on the right.

undark.org


*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12089
  • +234/-2936
    • View Profile
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo

*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12089
  • +234/-2936
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #778 on: Today at 12:55:13 PM »
And Trump isn’t that clever. Although he’s very good at running scams. It’s his one area of genius.

You guys were the ones saying that this was a war of whim with no plan and no strategy and no clear objectives, despite the WH publishing the strategy and objectives. A guy like Victor Davis Hanson who has been studying American foreign wars for over 50 years giving detailed daily breakdowns on the why and how. Military experts posting videos to socials and YouTube daily breaking down strategy and the machines and how they were being used. When I pointed this out, I was told my sources suck.

All this to say that I’m glad you’re coming around to the idea that there was a plan. A lot goes into something like this, it isn’t just Trump waving a magic wand out of nowhere and making a large scale military operation happen on the spot.
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo

*

alum74

  • *****
  • 2650
  • +1438/-124
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #779 on: Today at 01:50:16 PM »
You guys were the ones saying that this was a war of whim with no plan and no strategy and no clear objectives, despite the WH publishing the strategy and objectives. A guy like Victor Davis Hanson who has been studying American foreign wars for over 50 years giving detailed daily breakdowns on the why and how. Military experts posting videos to socials and YouTube daily breaking down strategy and the machines and how they were being used. When I pointed this out, I was told my sources suck.

All this to say that I’m glad you’re coming around to the idea that there was a plan. A lot goes into something like this, it isn’t just Trump waving a magic wand out of nowhere and making a large scale military operation happen on the spot.

Victor Davis Hanson is a neocon and Trump fluffer who was a staunch supporter for the 2003 Iraq invasion and holds interventionist foreign policy views.   

The stakes are never higher and there's nothing worse for a country or leader than going to war incompetently.  Iran has shown it can create challenges for the global economic system and force various parties to adjust.  Even though the U.S. holds overwhelming military power, it has accepted a two-week pause under conditions it cannot fully dictate. 

And what did Trump achieve? 

Regime change?  - Iran’s regime is now strengthened.
Capture/destroy their uranium? - We've basically given up on that.
Destroy their military? - Some of it yes, but they had enough to bomb other Gulf Petrostates, Israel, and U.S. military targets.

Iran now controls the Strait of Hormuz, and nothing we do short of boots on the ground is going to change that fact.  Perhaps Hanson and you can lead the first wave to take the Strait.  ALL GLORY TO GOD!!!


« Last Edit: Today at 02:23:52 PM by alum74 »