Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 12, 2026, 08:35:57 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 182886
  • Total Topics: 1511
  • Online Today: 165
  • Online Ever: 8243
  • (July 10, 2026, 02:18:36 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 119
Total: 119

BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)

  • 171 Replies
  • 7758 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #90 on: November 21, 2025, 08:44:38 AM »
PAMan’s concerns over “free shots” were voiced after a 30 point win in early November 3 years ago; unless he seems to think the problem would linger years later with an entirely different roster?
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13014
  • +179/-2695
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #91 on: November 21, 2025, 08:46:17 AM »
I’m talking about a specific season 3-4 years ago, genius…

This season ?


Not a concern, lol
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13014
  • +179/-2695
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #92 on: November 21, 2025, 08:54:13 AM »
A week after the 30 point win in which missed free shots are not a concern. Lol

Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13014
  • +179/-2695
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #93 on: November 21, 2025, 09:00:19 AM »
A week after the 30 point win with missed free shots from the team that couldn't shoot straight that are not a concern.

Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #94 on: November 21, 2025, 09:02:05 AM »
Laughing my mother fucking ass off.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #95 on: November 21, 2025, 09:03:18 AM »
Your buckshot approach pretty much missed everything.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13014
  • +179/-2695
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #96 on: November 21, 2025, 09:07:31 AM »
Your buckshot approach pretty much missed everything.
It's nothing to be concerned about. Lol
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #97 on: November 21, 2025, 09:08:57 AM »
This season ?


Not a concern, lol

That comment appears to be from the Virginia game that we lost by 9 and went 4-9 from the line. If we shoot a perfect 9-9 we almost certainly still lose. Wanna try again?
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #98 on: November 21, 2025, 09:10:33 AM »
It's nothing to be concerned about. Lol

Definitely not in a 30 point win in November.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13014
  • +179/-2695
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #99 on: November 21, 2025, 09:43:57 AM »
That comment appears to be from the Virginia game that we lost by 9 and went 4-9 from the line. If we shoot a perfect 9-9 we almost certainly still lose. Wanna try again?
Was that when Dainja missed the free shot that could have put us up 3, Va got the rebound for a fast break and outscored us 14-3 the rest of the way while making 7 free shots because we fouled them hoping they would miss the free shots ?
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #100 on: November 21, 2025, 09:45:09 AM »
LOLOLOLOLOLOL

The Free Shot that Could Have Changed the World.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #101 on: November 21, 2025, 09:46:34 AM »
Claiming we lost that game due to FT shooting is a tremendous stretch. One I doubt even Hawk Harrelson could cover.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #102 on: November 21, 2025, 09:49:14 AM »
And for the eleventeenth time, no one said “free shots don’t matter,” especially me.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13014
  • +179/-2695
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #103 on: November 21, 2025, 09:50:31 AM »
LOLOLOLOLOLOL

The Free Shot that Could Have Changed the World.
I guess that was the missed free shot then. Lol
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40935
  • +1103/-1095
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: BAMA VS ILLINI-Neutral Site (kinda)
« Reply #104 on: November 21, 2025, 09:52:14 AM »
I guess that was the missed free shot then. Lol

I wouldn’t have any recollection. It was a FT from 3 years ago. It’s possible. If your memory is really that good you shouldn’t be wasting time here.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth