You’re gonna be pretty disappointed (in my Caleb hate) should he be less than perfect immediately. You continuously fail to acknowledge how poorly Justin Fields was “set up to succeed” and how that has influenced by inclination to push back on your narratives. I’m not sure anyone other than Judge Judy has acknowledged what a shitty hand Justin was dealt (and he’s among thr last people I would expect to acknowledge this, but he’s also been all over the map on the issue).
I’ve said ad nauseam that a reasonable amount of Justin’s poor play rests on his own shoulders, and he needed to perform better. I also think what Justin went through would have broken most young quarterbacks, and I don’t think Justin is broken.
If you had even allowed a modicum of his struggles to be attributed to being in a real tough situation, I probably wouldn’t push back so much. I’ve even probably said 25x that your position has been a justifiable one, but you still paint me as someone who is a complete cult member. If you’re unwilling to read and comprehend wheat I write, it’s not my fault.
I'm already pretty disappointed in how far you're willing to stretch to criticize Caleb. It's transparent and shameless as hell. But it's, of course, EXACTLY what i expected. And I'm not stupid enough to think it's actually about Caleb - it, like almost every single one of your Bears takes for the last couple years, is about a weird obsession with Justin Fields.
You ABSOLUTELY HAVE NOT said that Justin Fields' poor play lies on his shoulders. That's a complete lie. Anyone who said that would get a dozen excuses from you for why it wasn't actually Fields' fault when he played poorly. It happened over and over and over last year - I can't even believe you were shameless enough to type that just now.
Of course he wasn't in a great situation. I acknowledged that dozens of times (but it didn't fit your little narrative, so now you're pretending). He also wasn't in a situation that was so bad that evaluating him wasn't possible. He also actually played poorly, separate from any 'situational' aspects, which no one here was allowed to even acknowledge without a five page argument about how Fields actually played well and everyone else played so badly that it made it seem like Fields played badly.
You're obviously never going to acknowledge reality here, so it's silly to waste any more time. If you want to go down with the ship screaming about how reasonable you were last year about Fields go right ahead. That's obviously a joke to anyone who actually read your posts here though.