If Tonyan catches that ball no one is bitching. Cleveland gives up 159 per game in the air with a 75 passer rating. I don’t know what Fields was (the two INTs were Hail Marys, one which should have been caught for a game winning touchdown). Sorry, a good NFL receiver catches a ball that falls in his lap. The Tonyan drop cost him 60 yards and a TD (and the win), but I know I know, if Fields plays better we win. Blah blah blah puke blah blah blah.
Tonyan’s drop results in a win, sure - IF you only count that one, and not the multiple dropped picks. But why would one hypothetical count and the others not?
I’m fine with counting all the plays that SHOULDVE been made (which IMO does not include the tipped Hail Mary, which was a prayer for a miracle in any case), or sticking only to the plays that WERE made - but the thing where we do the hypothetical for plays that would’ve made Fields’ numbers look better and not for plays that would’ve made them look worse is stupid. Every QB would look better if you erased all the drops from his guys but left all the defensive drops as they happened.
I read that the NFL statisticians can revoke an INT in a situation like the first Hail Mary if the ball wasn’t snapped afterwards - I assume if that’s true, they will and he’ll only be credited for 1 INT since the first one obviously should’ve been incomplete. I don’t hold the last INT against Fields at all. It’s a prayer.