It was really both of them. They might be the same person.

I do not think so. We sort of know who squeaky Dom is. Aye Vee Am Pee remains a mystery. He lives in ECI, but is not a native as he refers to channel 3 as WCIA. He is fairly ntelligent and fluent with English, but is also quite arrogant and struggles with American English idioms. English might not be his first language. 

Hmm. This sounds like a prime candidate for a Nichi-ism.

I looked up the numbers. His assist-to-TO ratio is just above 1.3. Not even close to the Top 50 in the nation.

But I did see where Nichi's confusion originated. He was highly recruited -- a 5-star. For some of the dimmer posters here -- and Nichi is definitely in that group -- stars mean more than actual season numbers.

Another great post, Nichi.

The sick perverted stalker IVMP just won't quit. He probably thinks he can chase Illiniray away too.

Nichi already reposted the nonsense about Michigan St.'s AdjD ranking within the conference on Jan. 20. Then he felt the need to point out that we need to pay to see those numbers.

Did you read it? It was within the last 2 days.

Can you read? That is probably the bigger question.

Methinks the purpose of that post flew right over your sad little pea brain.

Probably not. But Michigan St. guards hard and has loads of wings and bigs, yet still lost to Illinois.

Also, what was Arkansas' Adjusted Defense ranking within the SEC after 6-7 games? I know Nichi cares about things like that. The more inaccessible, the better.

Still mocking LKdog and telling us what nichi cares about?

Used the same language as Tempo in another post. However,  one thing  the mult wrote which makes me suspicious that s/he/they is just trying to put the blame on Tempo.

I am not Tempo gents.

I described exactly what happened.

It looks to me like you lied. You are a liar and a stalker.

Also, given that I am certain the latest cockpuppet will continue this indefinitely:

It's erroneous to assume that you don't need depth for a switching defense, despite what Nichi recalls about watching George Mikan play.

https://www.rookieroad.com/basketball/coaching/switch/#:~:text=Cons%20of%20Switching,-Even%20if%20the%20idea%20of

The site doesn't allow direct cut-and-paste, but one of the cons of switching is you need players who can match up with the opponent. This is covered in the section I link to here.

It isn't just about players getting tired, despite what dimwits like Nichi want to believe. You need people who can execute the maneuvers. And as I'm sure all the experts here already know, fresh defenders are a great thing to have if you're going to be chasing players off screens.

I'm sure we'll continue to go around in this circle, so I'll keep helping out the morons as needed.

This looks like an apt reply

No. A switching man defense does not require more depth than pressure defense. That is idiotic. That might be the densest thing you have posted yet. Maybe you confused depth with versatility? The sad thing is you don't even know you are stupid.

Makes sense to me.

What he said.
"This year's team actually started out with the depth to press a lot more. Then Goode broke his foot,  Melendez hurt his shoulder, and Clark left the team."

Maybe this will help
'This year's team actually started out with the depth to press a lot more, until the exhibition game. Then Goode broke his foot,  Melendez hurt his shoulder, and Clark left the team.'

But I highly doubt it.

Logic is not IVMP's strong suit. Nor is reading comprehension.