Kind of like how Mn always nitpicks where a post originated from, rather than debate it’s content
I think the latest "debates" about content may have begun with where the content originated. Then you would ask for a comment rather than point of origin, and the comment would be that the post from Jordan, Pakistan or South Asia was a lie, disinformation or whatever.
This morning's fishwrap includes an LA Times 'story' about Hegseth and the prayer breakfast. The story is essentially the same as Tempo's rage bait version from the guy based in Jordan.
The misinformation story went from Jordan, to Tempo, to HQ2, and then finally made it to the left coast and the LATimes. And now in this morning's fishwrap.
