* *

User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 18, 2026, 09:26:31 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Stats

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 177735
  • Total Topics: 1488
  • Online Today: 236
  • Online Ever: 4316
  • (October 16, 2025, 04:40:42 PM)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 104
Total: 106

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14]   Go Down

What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?

  • 202 Replies
  • 10195 Views

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12189
  • +235/-2952
    • View Profile
Re: What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?
« Reply #195 on: April 17, 2026, 05:51:38 PM »
Even Buddhist ray resorts to profanity when getting schooled by Mn
Logged
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo
*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9179
  • +616/-2091
    • View Profile
Re: What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?
« Reply #196 on: April 17, 2026, 08:22:05 PM »
Quote from: Custard on April 17, 2026, 05:51:38 PM
Even Buddhist ray resorts to profanity when getting schooled by Mn

Schooled?  No. Frustrated? Sort of. I don't come here to have my words taken out of context and the precise meaning picked apart, or to chase red herrings.

The points stand.

Biden did not have an open border.

Trump's policies are anti-immigration, not just anti illegal immigration.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2026, 08:25:38 PM by illiniray »
Logged
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”
*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9179
  • +616/-2091
    • View Profile
Re: What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?
« Reply #197 on: April 17, 2026, 08:24:46 PM »
Fu2
Logged
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”
*

Hal9000

  • **
  • 60
  • +3/-7
  • I'm sorry illiniray, I'm afraid i can't do that.
    • View Profile
Re: What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?
« Reply #198 on: April 17, 2026, 09:30:09 PM »
Quote from: illiniray on April 17, 2026, 08:24:46 PM
Fu2

There’s no solid evidence that Gautama Buddha used “swear words” in the way we think of them today.

In the earliest Buddhist texts (like the Pāli Canon), he’s portrayed as very deliberate and disciplined in speech. One of the core teachings is right speech (in Buddhism), which means avoiding:

harsh or abusive language

lying
gossip or divisive talk
pointless chatter

That said, he didn’t always speak gently in tone. There are moments where he uses sharp or blunt language to correct someone—calling behavior “foolish,” “ignorant,” or “unskillful.” In context, this wasn’t casual anger or venting; it was meant as instruction, not insult.

Also worth noting: what counts as a “swear word” is very culturally specific. Ancient India didn’t have the same categories of profanity we have today. So even when the Buddha used strong words, they weren’t the equivalent of modern curse words.

So:

No evidence of casual swearing or profanity

Occasional firm, even cutting speech, but with a teaching purpose

Strong emphasis on ethical, mindful communication
Logged
Just what do you think you're doing, illiniray?
*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9179
  • +616/-2091
    • View Profile
Re: What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?
« Reply #199 on: April 17, 2026, 10:55:49 PM »
I am.a former Buddhist. I used to practice with a Mahayana school that stressed devotion chanting.

I currently haven't taken any vows.

I have investigated other schools and various practices; some of which which I find both accessible and useful.

On speech, sarcasm is generally viewed as unwholesome because it is viewed as insincere, belittling, or cutting, a means of putting others down.  On the other, ironic humor and facetiousness are usually deemed to be wholesome because they help us see ourselves and elevate the discussion. It really comes down to intent.

It is interesting that Christians seem to demand a higher standard of conduct from Buddhists.
Logged
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”
*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12189
  • +235/-2952
    • View Profile
Re: What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?
« Reply #200 on: Today at 01:00:17 AM »
Quote from: illiniray on April 17, 2026, 10:55:49 PM
I am.a former Buddhist. I used to practice with a Mahayana school that stressed devotion chanting.

I currently haven't taken any vows.

I have investigated other schools and various practices; some of which which I find both accessible and useful.

On speech, sarcasm is generally viewed as unwholesome because it is viewed as insincere, belittling, or cutting, a means of putting others down.  On the other, ironic humor and facetiousness are usually deemed to be wholesome because they help us see ourselves and elevate the discussion. It really comes down to intent.

It is interesting that Christians seem to demand a higher standard of conduct from Buddhists.

I don’t hold anyone to a high standard here, I was just giving you shit.
Logged
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo
*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12553
  • +178/-2590
    • View Profile
Re: What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?
« Reply #201 on: Today at 06:48:20 AM »
Quote from: illiniray on April 17, 2026, 03:56:56 PM
Fuck you. I clarified several several times there were exceptions.

I think you are mistaken about the meaning of legal entities in this context.

"Legal Entities" in the Context of Entry:
It is important to note that "legal entity" usually refers to a business or organization. In the context of Title 42, the entities permitted to cross the border for essential travel (e.g., trade, work, tourism) generally continued to function, as the policy was focused specifically on migrants and asylum seekers at the border.

who were the legal entities that entered during title 42?

Under the Title 42 policy (March 2020 – May 2023), the U.S. government primarily expelled migrants rather than allowing them to enter. However, specific groups and individuals were permitted to enter or were exempted from the quick-expulsion policy, including:

*Unaccompanied Minors: Following a November 2020 court ruling and subsequent CDC orders in February 2021, unaccompanied children were exempted from Title 42 and allowed into the U.S. to undergo standard immigration processing.

*Vulnerable Families: While many families were expelled, some were exempted on a case-by-case basis due to humanitarian concerns or because Mexico could not accept them, particularly as policies shifted later in the pandemic.
Specific Nationalities (Post-2022): In late 2022, the Biden administration introduced parole programs for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans who applied online, had a sponsor, and arrived by air.

*Ukrainian Nationals: In response to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Biden administration created an expedited program for Ukrainians, allowing many to enter through humanitarian parole and exemptions from Title 42.

*Those with Humanitarian Exceptions: Some individuals, including specific asylum seekers with urgent protection needs, were granted exceptions to the policy by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at ports of entry.

There were exceptions for some individuals ?

« Last Edit: Today at 06:51:11 AM by Somewhere in Mn »
Logged
*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12553
  • +178/-2590
    • View Profile
Re: What is the Democrat Platform in 2025?
« Reply #202 on: Today at 07:26:55 AM »
Immigration was an 80/20 issue in the 2024 election cycle.

Tho I don't know if it's knowable, I doubt if the majority of individuals in the 20 category are as open borders as David Bier.

« Last Edit: Today at 07:32:25 AM by Somewhere in Mn »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14]   Go Up
« previous next »