I’m quite confident I wouldn’t have said anything that snarky if I hadn’t been catching grief for not accepting his opinion, as variable fact
You were catching grief for a very specific thing - you can go back and check.
You were catching grief for ranting about how the guy who agreed with you was credible, and the guy who didn’t wasn’t any more credible than you are (despite the actual credibility gap there being quite large).
Go back and look. No one anywhere mocked you for not taking Brad Biggs’ word as unassailable fact, nobody. I mocked you for hand waving one “credible” view because it disagreed with you, while doing the “and I bet he knows more about it than spark mandrill!” nonsense about the view that did agree with you. In response you said ACTUALLY, the Bears best writer isn’t any more credible than you are.
I know it’s easier to just make up what happened and assume you’re right, but like 99% of the other times you try to reinterpret someone’s words rather than taking them at face value, you have done it poorly.