So you made my point. He could be wrong.
Sorry, did I ever say he literally could not be wrong?
You literally make 15-20 strawmen a day arguing about this.
I’m willing to argue with you using “your logic”, but “your logic” shifts wildly based on whether the outcome confirms or contradicts your preconceptions.
I tend to think Aikman is credible about QB play, but he has been and easily could again be wrong. Bears beat writers are also likely credible about the Bears FO thinking, but have been and easily could again be wrong.
You agree with one of those things and disagree with the other, and the deciding factor is whether they agree with you or not. It’s stupid as hell.