Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - No one in Mn

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 858
1
Fighting Illini Basketball Forum / Re: 2025-26 NBA thread
« on: July 27, 2026, 09:06:38 AM »
For those who missed the WNBA All Star game, here are some of the highlights ...

https://x.com/BrickCenter_/status/2081206732999864578/video/1

2
Minnesota got there own wildfires. Maybe Trump will cut their funding.
Minnesota funding got cut over things that there should have been control over.
On second thought, they knew it was happening so I guess they did have control over it.

There were storms around Lake Vermilion the last couple of days and hopefully put a damper on the fires, often the result of campers.
The Boundary Waters Canoe Area is opening up some areas to day trips and overnight use.


3
Either you were burning too much fish wrap or there was smoke from the Canadian wildfires the last couple of days!
Don't look at me.

I'll be in Canada tomorrow. Straight north, not northeast, and hopefully smoke free.

4
The Deuce / Re: WTF is wrong with the left?
« on: July 26, 2026, 09:59:02 AM »
The Free Love days✌️

6
Halas Hall Football Forum / Re: Bret Bielema is Trash
« on: July 25, 2026, 07:52:16 AM »
Hey man, when it comes to benevolence, be loathe to question the commitment of tempo.
Hey thanks, I'll keep that in mind.

7
Halas Hall Football Forum / Re: Bret Bielema is Trash
« on: July 24, 2026, 07:58:37 AM »
Trash, I tell ya.

"This is Bielema's third straight year on the AFCA Good Works Team nominee list."

https://fightingillini.com/news/2026/7/20/football-henderson-bielema-nominated-for-allstate-afca-good-works-team

8
The Deuce / Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« on: July 24, 2026, 07:30:50 AM »
You appear to be on a 'smear' campaign.
🥱

AI

No comprehensive evidence shows Nick Shirley harassed people, aggressively questioned everyone, refused to stop recording when asked, or refused to leave premises across all (or even most) locations in his Minnesota daycare video. His tactics have been criticized as reckless or sensationalized by some, but descriptions portray him as persistent investigative journalism rather than outright illegal harassment. 🤔

csmonitor.com

Summary from Reports and the Video ContextHarassment claims: Critics (including some media outlets, CAIR, and defenders of the centers) described his approach as biased, sensationalized, and potentially anti-immigrant in framing (many targeted centers were Somali-run). They argued it created a hostile environment or unfairly implied fraud without full context (e.g., locked doors for safety, holiday timing, or prior inspections). However, there are no widespread reports of physical harassment, threats, or repeated unwanted contact beyond his one-time visits and filming.

csmonitor.com

Aggressive questioning: Shirley used confrontational, direct questioning typical of investigative YouTubers (e.g., asking why places appeared empty, referencing public funding records, knocking on doors, and commenting on the spot). Not every location involved intense interrogation—some showed him observing locked/blacked-out buildings or minimal activity with narration. He did press staff or representatives at certain sites.

judiciary.house.gov

Recording and leaving premises: In similar later videos (e.g., New York adult daycares), staff told him to leave after questioning, and he appears to have complied (common in his style: film the interaction and depart).

@TrumpNews_Baby

No prominent reports or lawsuits from the Minnesota video indicate he refused to stop filming when explicitly asked or trespassed by refusing to leave. Centers often have locked doors for child safety, which he highlighted as suspicious. Critics noted he may not have always visited during peak hours or accounted for operational norms.

komonews.com

Recklessness of tactics: This is subjective and debated. Critics called it reckless because it risked doxxing businesses/owners, potentially endangering communities, spreading unverified claims (some centers had children present or were later found compliant in parts), and amplifying stereotypes without professional investigation standards. Some centers faced backlash, closures, or scrutiny post-video.

csmonitor.com

Supporters (and Shirley himself) viewed it as legitimate journalism using public records, open visits, and documentation of what he observed, which drew official attention to potential issues and led to investigations/charges in some cases.

judiciary.house.gov

The ~41-minute video involved visits to nearly a dozen centers. Behavior varied by site—some showed empty appearances with little interaction; others had more direct engagement. No evidence of systematic refusal to stop recording or leave, and no criminal charges against Shirley for his Minnesota actions.

mprnews.org

Overall, his methods align with aggressive citizen journalism that polarizes audiences: effective at spotlighting issues for some, overly confrontational or misleading for others. Legal experts generally note that filming in public or semi-public spaces (like business exteriors) is protected, but private property rules apply inside.


9
The Deuce / Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« on: July 23, 2026, 01:24:06 PM »
Do you have a list of the court cases with decisions, other than moot, resulting in violations of the Emoluments Clause ?

I believe it's 0.

How many cases was Norm Eisen involved with ?

It's more than 0.

10
The Deuce / Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« on: July 23, 2026, 07:18:44 AM »
Trump defenders whining about weaponized lawfare is ludicrous. Tell that to Davy Hearn.

Potential does too mean squat. Conflicts of interest are usually taken seriously. There is a reason for the Emoluments Clauses.
Do you have a list of the court cases with decisions resulting in violations of the Emoluments Clause ?

I believe it's 0.

How many cases was Norm Eisen involved with ?

It's more than 0.

11
The Deuce / Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« on: July 22, 2026, 06:13:44 AM »
Financial Conflicts of Interest: Unlike previous commanders-in-chief, President Trump has maintained ownership of his business empire rather than placing his assets in a blind trust. Ethics watchdogs frequently cite this arrangement as a primary source of potential "pay-to-play" violations.

Emoluments Concerns: Investigations into foreign and domestic transactions have raised questions regarding the Constitution's Emoluments Clauses, which prohibit the president from receiving financial favors from foreign states or profiting from the federal government beyond a salary.

Government Appointments: Critics have highlighted the appointment of major political donors and business figures to key regulatory roles and federal boards as evidence of influence-peddling.

While critics and political opponents often use the "TDS" label to dismiss intense, emotional reactions to the President, those raising corruption concerns rely on tangible, concrete events. Nonpartisan monitoring organizations such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the Campaign Legal Center extensively track and litigate these ethics violations, providing a factual foundation for the allegations that goes beyond political bias.
"potential"
Doesn't mean squat other than possible.

"raised questions"
Doesn't mean squat without the answer.

"Critics have highlighted"
Critics highlighted evidence of the possibility of a lab leak for covid. How did things work out for those critics ?
There are critics on both sides of the aisle.

Yes, we're well aware of the litigation.
I read that all 14 district court judges in the Northern District of California were appointed by Obama or Biden.
I read that 900+ cases have been filed against Trump and/or the administration with Norm Eisen claiming involvement in over 300.

Some may refer to the 'litigation' as weaponized lawfare and judge shopping.

From AI sourcing the wiki........

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) are both 501(c)(3) nonprofits focused on government ethics, accountability, campaign finance, voting rights, and democracy issues. They are generally viewed as left-leaning or progressive in orientation and practice, despite claiming nonpartisan status.

en.wikipedia.org +1

CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington)Founders: Norman L. Eisen (white-collar lawyer who later served as President Obama’s chief ethics lawyer and ambassador) and Melanie Sloan (former federal prosecutor and congressional staffer for Democrats). Founded in 2003 (some sources note 2002).

en.wikipedia.org


12
The Deuce / Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« on: July 22, 2026, 05:55:02 AM »
Woke AI
Concerns regarding corruption in the Trump administration cannot be simply dismissed as obsessive "Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS), as they are rooted in documented actions and unprecedented ethical challenges. Observers, legal experts, and government watchdogs point to a wide range of specific, verifiable issues that define the administration's approach to governance:
Lol.

13
The Deuce / Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« on: July 22, 2026, 05:49:33 AM »
Was MN Best one of the 11 day care centers NS visited and harassed?.
It was mentioned in his video.
You keep using the word 'harassed'.
The court filing refers to state acknowledged overbilling that apparently was ignored, as was much of the fraud pointed out to state officials during the last several years.

14
The Deuce / Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« on: July 21, 2026, 01:16:18 PM »
The ones that sued?
"18.       Similarly, the amended notice to CLOUD claimed that a DHS OIG surveillance

operation had exposed overbilling from January through March 2025, nearly a full year before

DCYF sent the initial CCAP suspension notice to CLOUD in the aftermath of the Shirley video.

       19.       On information and belief, the purported “credible allegations” of fraud against

Plaintiffs HOPKINS CCC and CLOUD cited in the initial CCAP suspension notices in fact

reflected Defendants’ decision to simply accept the allegations in Shirley’s video as “credible” so

that Defendants could attempt to appease the federal government by “throwing Plaintiffs under the

bus” and did not reflect any objective or good-faith investigation of Plaintiffs’ childcare

operations.#

DCYF is a successor agency to the Minnesota Department of Human Services’ oversight of the
CCAP program in Minnesota.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72289831/4/hopkins-child-care-center-llc-v-brown/

The state had evidence of overbillings well before Shirley visited the centers.
Did they file suit because the state was forced to act by the video ? They appear to be saying 'yes, to appease the federal government.'
I'm not sure the state has shown much willingness to appease the federal government on many issues.

15
The Deuce / Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« on: July 21, 2026, 12:52:03 PM »
I  see the connection to Bock. These do not appear to be connected to the centers that Nick Shirley harassed.
Minnesota Best Childcare Center (MN Best) is led and operated by figures connected to broader state investigations, including CEO Fowsiya Hassan, and is tied in court documents to business networks associated with Ali Egal, Abdirisak Abdulle, and Fardous Egal.

The 4 were charged Friday.

Nick Shirley mentioned Mn Best in his video.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 858