Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 06, 2026, 08:23:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 182613
  • Total Topics: 1507
  • Online Today: 114
  • Online Ever: 8243
  • (July 10, 2026, 02:18:36 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 90
Total: 90

college football talk

  • 1272 Replies
  • 163536 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #585 on: January 06, 2024, 11:58:20 AM »
Hopefully Justin Fields. Looks like you’ve ran everybody off…

Sorry the Justin Fields debate hits everyone in their soft little feels.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #586 on: January 06, 2024, 12:00:13 PM »
The contract alone makes this a no brainer. If they keep him, means Poles is actually as idiotic as I have claimed.

If you fall for the “gotta have a quarterback on a rookie contract” narrative, which is lazy in this case. Lazy analysis. The Bears are not a slave to the rookie deal. They have money. That was the whole point of the tank. But people who fall for basic tropes dont get it.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #587 on: January 06, 2024, 12:05:20 PM »
Show me which team “won the Super Bowl because of the rookie contract.”

In pretty much every case, the team was already built. Besides maybe the Mannings, I don’t see any teams that weren’t built after the fact.” Like say the current Jaguars.

“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #588 on: January 06, 2024, 12:07:02 PM »
Ugh, stupid link won’t post. I’ll get it up in a minute.

“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #589 on: January 06, 2024, 12:08:51 PM »
So 6 in 30 years, if you count Wentz. And Mahomes, Beady, and Roethlisberger landed on a ready to win teams.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #590 on: January 06, 2024, 12:15:35 PM »
Fields’ contract the next two years is not prohibitive. Might not even be 3-4 years if he stayed that long. You could franchise him for two years
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #591 on: January 06, 2024, 12:29:58 PM »
Unless the rookie QB is an immediate upgrade (huge if, no matter what you guys say) they’d actually be eating into a year or two window in which the team can win.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32577
  • +617/-2483
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #592 on: January 06, 2024, 02:05:15 PM »
If you fall for the “gotta have a quarterback on a rookie contract” narrative, which is lazy in this case. Lazy analysis. The Bears are not a slave to the rookie deal. They have money. That was the whole point of the tank. But people who fall for basic tropes dont get it.

Jaylon Johnson says "Pay me."

The money/cap is not unlimited.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32577
  • +617/-2483
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #593 on: January 06, 2024, 02:05:52 PM »
Fields’ contract the next two years is not prohibitive. Might not even be 3-4 years if he stayed that long. You could franchise him for two years

Why? He sucks. That would be stupid.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #594 on: January 06, 2024, 05:57:53 PM »
Jaylon Johnson says "Pay me."

The money/cap is not unlimited.

No one says it is. Cutting EJax and Whitehair pretty much pays for Jaylon Johnson next year. The Bears have money.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32577
  • +617/-2483
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #595 on: January 06, 2024, 10:21:02 PM »
No one says it is. Cutting EJax and Whitehair pretty much pays for Jaylon Johnson next year. The Bears have money.

We heard about this same movie last year. Called Groundhog Day.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #596 on: January 06, 2024, 10:22:00 PM »
We heard about this same movie last year. Called Groundhog Day.

Your posts are Groundhog Day.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40857
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #597 on: January 06, 2024, 10:24:39 PM »
Coaches think they are so damn smart. That play call was far worse than Russell Wilson throwing the ball at the goal line in the SB IMO. Can’t have arguably the best RB in football on the sideline on 4th and 1 with the season on the line.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32577
  • +617/-2483
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #598 on: January 06, 2024, 10:24:55 PM »
Your posts are Groundhog Day.

Look forward to the reruns of your posts about cap space and draft picks and the lack of need for linemen
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

ILLove1997

  • *****
  • 6450
  • +80/-2021
    • View Profile
Re: college football talk
« Reply #599 on: January 07, 2024, 12:58:45 AM »
This is the college football talk thread you retards
----------------------------------------------------
Inaugural Official HQ2 Tempo AOTC Award Winner
2025 - Pot stirrer of the year