Who did I say Illinois is (historically) way better than? Utah? Performance wise, they are mostly comparable. What isn’t comparable is the conference (especially when considering their conferences historically), and visibility. No one but hardcore basketball fans watch west coast basketball. Dee Brown had a higher profile here than he would have had at Utah. That’s pretty much undebatable. Didn’t Utah have a #1 overall pick 15 years or so ago? I can’t even recall who it was. And I actually watched a lot of college ball back then.
You mentioned Illinois has a 'better scope' than Utah, but couldn't define that.
I think Illinois IS a better program historically, but it's pretty close, and "it just is" isn't really a compelling argument. I think that because of the programs' results, not because of their conference or their "scope" or any other nebulous made up criteria I could use.
Why does their historical conference matter? Did their successes come in the Mid-Major NCAA Tournament? They play in a high-major conference now, and have for more than a decade.
It was Andrew Bogut. He went two picks in front of our All American. Milwaukee must not have known about the scope. No way they thought the best player on Utah tended to be better than the best player on Illinois.