Total Members Voted: 16
Voting closed: April 26, 2023, 11:18:32 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Like I said, I am having a tough time comprehending your point in order to come up with something else.Are you saying that Illinois inherently has advantages that ASU does not?
Do both have equal histories? Equal facilities? Equal budgets? Equal conferences? Equal local talent pools? Etc?
Equal playing fields? Yes. They’re both major universities that play high major basketball, both had been similarly mediocre when the current coaches were hired, etc. There’s nothing stopping ASU from hiring a good coach and getting good results, and as we’ve seen first hand there’s nothing stopping Illinois from hiring a mediocre coach and getting mediocre results That notably isn’t at all what the poll says.
Kentucky basketball budget 17.6 million. Memphis, 6.4. But Calipari can be just as good at Memphis as he’s been at Kentucky, right? Doubtful.
I just looked it up. Illinois’ basketball budget for ‘23 was almost 9 million. Almost twice that of OSU, which ranks like 87th. But no competitive advantage there, amirite?https://theresourcenexus.com/budget/Edit: my bad, don’t know why I looked at Oregon State. Meant Arizona State. Still a healthy 25%+ more budgeted at Illinois.
Not to mention alumni support. I guarantee you Illinois alumni/fan support dwarf that of ASU. But none of that matters, amirite?
In terms of evaluating a coach?Nope, not even a little bit.Illinois' athletic budget dwarfs all the schools we talked about earlier too, Iona and UMass and Memphis. Doesn't matter, when they got great coaches they got great results; when we got mediocre coaches we got mediocre results.I understand you think that's just a coincidence, but it isn't.
So now things like history, talent pools, conference, and allocated resources don’t matter? I wish we’d make up our minds here…the fact that Illinois has CONSISTENTLY outperformed ASU over the last 50 years says…Advantage: Illinois. There is no other logical conclusion.