Lots of layers here. Any specific reason Illinois hired better coaches? Higher profile conference? Better facilities/infrastructure? More homegrown talent? Dumb luck? Before we hired Lou we had the guy that replaced John Wooden at UC freaking LA. Illinois is a desirable job. The coach and the job are entertwined. That’s been my point all along.
The guy who replaced John Wooden was 8-18 (4-14) in his one season at Illinois. He also left UCLA after two years for UAB - which I suppose must be a more desirable program than UI or UCLA, right?
Illinois has historically hired good coaches - particularly three straight Hall of Fame coaches that built us from an also-ran into a nationally competitive program. That's the difference between the programs. It's not the name on the jersey. When Illinois hired a mediocre coach to replace a Hall of Famer, the results became mediocre. That isn't a coincidence.
The notion that a coach winning considerably more at Illinois is 'comparable' to a coach winning considerably less at another high major basketball program is just not found in evidence.