The point is Underwood may have just caught lightning in a bottle (like Nagy) instead of shown an ability to win at a high level consistently. The jury is out.
He won multiple tournament games with a team from the Southland Conference.
Made the tournament in his first year at a high Major at OK State.
Resurrected our program.
There's a reason his record is notably better than Hurley's even if you, for some unknown stupid reason, disqualify his biggest successes. Like even if you cut off Underwood's best three years in his career, his record - win%, conf win%, tournament appearances, tournament wins - is notably better than Hurley's. He won two more tournament games in his three years in the Southland than Hurley has in his 10 year career.
If you're going to call two coaches comparable, you surely must have some sort of reasoning as to why one's results would be so notably better than the others', right?