For the end of the bench maybe or on a bad Big 10 team. If Ty Rodgers is one of your key players, your team is going to suck. Rodgers belongs in the MAC or a lower level where he can be a small ball 3/4 and his lack of shooting/height won’t hurt him.
It’s like arguing Minnesota’s players are Big 10 caliber bc they are on the team. They aren’t.
I was wrong about Clark. Thought he would be a stud here. I don't think it's lack of ability though. He needs to grow up.
I think you were pretty high on Epps. The offensive skills are there. He might still be good. Can he defend at this level?
Rodgers is already a proven BIG level rotation player. He is a plus defender, rebounder, ball handler, and passer. Yes, he would be dominant at the mid major level.
Your comparison of Dainja with Pruitt was odd because they couldn't be more different in terms of length, hands, and footwork.
You were about 33% right about Mayer. He was Jekyll & Hyde. Bad Matt would show up about 1/3 of the time. Good Matt was often our best player. Without good Matt, we are in the NIT.
Recent
tourney talk
by Illinifan5775 Hoppy Easter, Cesspoolers... by ThePAMan
How will Underwood leave? by Tempo34
Anyone been getting pussy... by Custard
Total Members: 111