I can't remember the last time I read anything from Mother Jones.
I occasionally might look at what NPR has to say.
CNN has a little more cred than FNC, not much..
I gather Custard gets his news from the site formerly known as Twitter? Or maybe Newsmax and Daily Collar?
This sort of post is why we are in trouble. I don't really watch FOX because whenever it's on, something that is clearly counterfactual is presented as fact, so there's no point.
If you watch CNN or MSNBC, you do have to ferret out things that are fact from a firehose of conclusions based on those facts, some of which aren't a good connection of those facts. But if you are watching CNN and you see someone smash through a window in the Capitol, the fact it was on CNN doesn't make it fake. It's real video.
It's pretty simple to filter out the histrionic as they appear. Olbermann stopped being a reporter and started being an ANGRY MAN pretty fast, so you don't get a lot of information per minute. Maddow started that way. Lemon slowly veered that way. Chris Hayes can make it pretty clear what is conclusion is, but I like that he does present a lot of raw information first. Hannity, Ingraham, Tucker - they skip any actual evidence and just go to wild unsupported conclusions.