Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 27, 2026, 11:03:53 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 178249
  • Total Topics: 1489
  • Online Today: 262
  • Online Ever: 4316
  • (October 16, 2025, 04:40:42 PM)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 127
Total: 129

wtf is wrong with the right?

  • 8560 Replies
  • 969636 Views

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9230
  • +618/-2092
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2070 on: March 24, 2022, 08:04:37 PM »
Sabotaged?

Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court...

And all indications are he still likes beer.
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

Chickengeorge

  • *****
  • 1958
  • +47/-659
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2071 on: March 24, 2022, 09:04:45 PM »

*

Judge Judy

  • *****
  • 11911
  • +120/-1807
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2072 on: March 24, 2022, 09:10:24 PM »
😂
Because FOX News told me so…

HQ2 Cesspool March Madness champion 🏆

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9230
  • +618/-2092
    • View Profile
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9230
  • +618/-2092
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2074 on: March 25, 2022, 01:02:38 PM »
The parts I saw, Jackson pretty much schooled long winded GOP Senators. Her answers were mostly brief and to the point.

I think it was Cornyn who spent most of his time "testifying", then wanted more time because she took too long answering.

A bone of contention that gets little media coverage is unenumerated rights and substantive due process. Cornyn, Blackburn, and John Neely Kennedy brought  this up. Probably Graham and Cruz too? Cornyn rambled on and on about "Oberfell".  Blackburn attacked Roe and Griswold. Kennedy thinks the Constitution only protects rights explicitly mentioned, the enumerated rights. He actually said voters should decide unenumerated rights. Others wingnuts have said these should be decided by the respective States.


« Last Edit: March 25, 2022, 03:02:48 PM by illiniray »
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 31448
  • +606/-2430
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2075 on: March 25, 2022, 01:29:20 PM »
Justice Anne Burke at least recused herself in the case over use of aldermanic campaign funds to pay for criminal defense expenses. Now we find out that SCOTUS Justice Thomas voted to hide his wife seditious texts in an 8-1 decision instead of recusing himself.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

Chickengeorge

  • *****
  • 1958
  • +47/-659
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2076 on: March 25, 2022, 03:57:29 PM »

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9230
  • +618/-2092
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2077 on: March 25, 2022, 04:25:21 PM »


ha ha. The question was  “Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?”

This was in the context of transgender athletes. Sen. Blackburn was looking for a legal definition, a scientific definition..

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/03/25/ketanji-brown-jackson-woman/

btw, Senator Blackburn doesn't think you have a right to privacy because it's not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution.
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

murphstahoe

  • *****
  • 8107
  • +1974/-142
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2078 on: March 25, 2022, 04:30:56 PM »
ha ha. The question was  “Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?”

This was in the context of transgender athletes. Sen. Blackburn was looking for a legal definition, a scientific definition..

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/03/25/ketanji-brown-jackson-woman/

btw, Senator Blackburn doesn't think you have a right to privacy because it's not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution.

Perhaps the end game for the GOP is to put the NCAA into a corner that they just run "Open" sports without respect to gender/sex/whatever, in order to not have to deal with the Government trying to tell them what they can and cannot do.

That will allow them to gut Title 9

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12589
  • +179/-2593
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2079 on: March 25, 2022, 04:42:32 PM »
I'm guessing Blackburn asked a question, in a round about way, to someone who has shown leniency in sentencing pedophiles whether she would support women's rights.
She got her answer.
It will get used in the mid-terms.
Jackson will be approved anyway.

*

Judge Judy

  • *****
  • 11911
  • +120/-1807
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2080 on: March 25, 2022, 04:49:52 PM »
I'm guessing Blackburn asked a question, in a round about way, to someone who has shown leniency in sentencing pedophiles whether she would support women's rights.
She got her answer.
It will get used in the mid-terms.
Jackson will be approved anyway.

This. Mid-term elections are gonna be very brutal for liberals I think.
Because FOX News told me so…

HQ2 Cesspool March Madness champion 🏆

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9230
  • +618/-2092
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2081 on: March 25, 2022, 05:14:24 PM »
I'm guessing Blackburn asked a question, in a round about way, to someone who has shown leniency in sentencing pedophiles whether she would support women's rights.
She got her answer.
It will get used in the mid-terms.
Jackson will be approved anyway.

What I saw, Blackburn was basically testifying. Cruz was posturing and the jackass Hawley QAnon-signaling.  Even conservatives were embarassed and dismayed by their conduct.

Senator Hawley’s Disingenuous Attack against Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Pornography
By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
" Senator Josh Hawley (R., Mo.) that Judge Jackson is appallingly soft on child-pornography offenders. The allegation appears meritless to the point of demagoguery."
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/03/senator-hawleys-disingenuous-attack-against-judge-jacksons-record-on-child-pornography/amp/



“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12589
  • +179/-2593
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2082 on: March 25, 2022, 05:18:21 PM »
What I saw, Blackburn was basically testifying. Cruz was posturing and the jackass Hawley QAnon-signaling.  Even conservatives were embarassed and dismayed by their conduct.

Senator Hawley’s Disingenuous Attack against Judge Jackson’s Record on Child Pornography
By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
" Senator Josh Hawley (R., Mo.) that Judge Jackson is appallingly soft on child-pornography offenders. The allegation appears meritless to the point of demagoguery."
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/03/senator-hawleys-disingenuous-attack-against-judge-jacksons-record-on-child-pornography/amp/




Now do Cory Booker.

*

alum74

  • *****
  • 2669
  • +1442/-124
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2083 on: March 25, 2022, 05:20:32 PM »

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9230
  • +618/-2092
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #2084 on: March 25, 2022, 05:24:24 PM »
Constitutionally unsound rulings like Griswold vs. Connecticut, Kelo v. the city of New London, and NFIB vs. Sebelius confused Tennesseans and left Congress wondering who gave the court permission to bypass our system of checks and balances," Blackburn said
...
The Griswold decision was a landmark case in 1965, when seven Supreme Court justices voted married couples have a right to "marital privacy" in the decision to use birth control. The decision invalidated a 19th-century Connecticut law banning contraceptive use.
...
Though marital privacy, or broader privacy rights, are not explicitly stated in the Constitution, the majority in Griswold found that fundamental rights to privacy are implied within at least five amendments. [extreme] Conservative critics who prefer a strict reading of the Constitution have long criticized the ruling as an overstep.
https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2022/03/21/marsha-blackburn-criticizes-1965-supreme-court-ruling-birth-control/7120236001/
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”