Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 03, 2026, 02:04:39 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 179888
  • Total Topics: 1496
  • Online Today: 357
  • Online Ever: 4316
  • (October 16, 2025, 04:40:42 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 305
Total: 305

wtf is wrong with the right?

  • 8719 Replies
  • 1002818 Views

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40016
  • +1073/-1061
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8700 on: May 24, 2026, 12:25:54 PM »
Absolute truth. Suck it, right-wingers.

"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12725
  • +179/-2623
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8701 on: May 24, 2026, 01:31:29 PM »
You made it sound like Durbin went out and hired her.
You made it sound as tho Durbin wasn't involved in the process.

And what would any of Durbin approving her detailing to minority counsel on Senate Judiciary have to do with the 'Durbin didn't have a reason to oppose her' ?

If he opposed her, she wouldn't have been given the position. He didn't.

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9373
  • +628/-2099
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8702 on: May 24, 2026, 01:47:27 PM »
You made it sound as tho Durbin wasn't involved in the process.

No I didn't. 👀 Pointed out that Durbin didn't hire her. You said he gave her a job. That's not true.

Quote
And what would any of Durbin approving her detailing to minority counsel on Senate Judiciary have to do with the 'Durbin didn't have a reason to oppose her' ?

The assignment of those details is routine. You act like it was significant that Durbin didn't reject her. If he had a reason to oppose, he wouldn't have approved. It's not rocket surgery.

Quote

If he opposed her, she wouldn't have been given the position. He didn't.

That's a sharp observation..
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12725
  • +179/-2623
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8703 on: May 24, 2026, 03:20:19 PM »
No I didn't. 👀 Pointed out that Durbin didn't hire her. You said he gave her a job. That's not true.

The assignment of those details is routine. You act like it was significant that Durbin didn't reject her. If he had a reason to oppose, he wouldn't have approved. It's not rocket surgery.

That's a sharp observation..
"If he had a reason to oppose, he wouldn't have approved."

He could either give her the job or not.
She got the job..

If you want to attach any ill intent, or lack thereof, on the part of her being given the job that's up to you.
She wasn't given a position by the Senate Judiciary majority. That's for sure.

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9373
  • +628/-2099
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8704 on: May 24, 2026, 08:16:17 PM »

She wasn't given a position by the Senate Judiciary majority. That's for sure.

She was assigned the position by the DoJ. That's not hard to understand.
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12725
  • +179/-2623
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8705 on: May 25, 2026, 06:12:26 AM »
She was assigned the position by the DoJ. That's not hard to understand.
In a statement to Block Club Monday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Fitzpatrick, a spokesperson for the office, confirmed her withdrawal from the case.

“Ms. Mecklenburg is an experienced prosecutor who applied for and received a temporary detail within a different branch of the federal government,” Fitzpatrick said.

Durbin had the approval authority and she then "received a temporary detail......."

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40016
  • +1073/-1061
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8706 on: May 28, 2026, 01:49:52 AM »
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40016
  • +1073/-1061
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8707 on: June 01, 2026, 12:00:46 PM »
Vivek saying a black baby is probably safer on the streets of Chicago than in it's mother's womb. Fucking weirdos.

https://x.com/i/status/2061455571035787313
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

alum74

  • *****
  • 2698
  • +1449/-124
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8708 on: June 01, 2026, 01:06:33 PM »
Talarico cooking Republicans for 6 minutes.

https://x.com/briana__gomez/status/2059682328025186422?s=46&t=taZJ_d5ITWr6Hq3PUZDUiQ

He appears to be a much better D senate candidate than Beto.  Will be interesting to see if he can connect with disaffected Cornyn runoff voters.  I think most will vote for Paxton or stay home.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40016
  • +1073/-1061
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8709 on: June 01, 2026, 05:19:27 PM »
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9373
  • +628/-2099
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8710 on: June 01, 2026, 09:18:51 PM »
"Samuel Alito Cited Fudged Data in His Ruling Gutting Voting Rights Act"

Sadly, nothing will be done about it anytime soon. It should give a future court grounds to overturn the case.

https://newrepublic.com/post/210174/samuel-alito-bad-data-ruling-voting-rights-act
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

Somewhere in Mn

  • *****
  • 12725
  • +179/-2623
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8711 on: June 01, 2026, 09:49:31 PM »
"Samuel Alito Cited Fudged Data in His Ruling Gutting Voting Rights Act"

Sadly, nothing will be done about it anytime soon. It should give a future court grounds to overturn the case.

https://newrepublic.com/post/210174/samuel-alito-bad-data-ruling-voting-rights-act
What data was "fudged" ?

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9373
  • +628/-2099
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8712 on: June 02, 2026, 04:25:37 PM »
What data was "fudged" ?

Click on the link. The article explains. It's a little bit hard to grasp, so some effort is required.
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”

*

Hal9000

  • **
  • 64
  • +3/-7
  • I'm sorry illiniray, I'm afraid i can't do that.
    • View Profile
Re: wtf is wrong with the right?
« Reply #8713 on: June 02, 2026, 04:31:23 PM »
I had not figured in my computations that Nichi would be back. Interesting

The controversy is not that data were proven to be fabricated, but that Justice Samuel Alito relied on a voter-turnout statistic that many election experts say was calculated using a misleading methodology.

In the 2026 case Louisiana v. Callais, Alito wrote that Black voters had turned out at rates equal to or higher than white voters in two of the five most recent presidential elections, both nationally and in Louisiana. He cited a Department of Justice brief that calculated turnout using the total voting-age population (everyone 18 and older) as the denominator.

Critics argue that this measure is misleading because it includes people who are not eligible to vote, such as non-citizens and some people disenfranchised because of felony convictions. Election researchers generally prefer using the citizen voting-age population (CVAP) or the eligible-voter population when calculating turnout.

According to those critics, when the standard eligible-voter measures are used:

Black turnout in Louisiana exceeded white turnout only once (2012), not in two of the last five presidential elections.

Nationally, Black turnout has generally lagged white turnout in the most recent presidential elections rather than exceeding it.

So the disputed data point was the claim about Black voter turnout relative to white voter turnout. The argument from critics is that the underlying numbers were generated using an atypical denominator that made Black turnout appear higher than it would under the methodology commonly used by election scholars.

Supporters of the opinion might respond that the Court relied on data submitted in a government brief and that disagreements over statistical methodology do not necessarily mean the data were intentionally falsified. The dispute is therefore primarily about methodology and interpretation rather than a finding by a court or official body that numbers were fabricated.
Just what do you think you're doing, illiniray?

*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9373
  • +628/-2099
    • View Profile
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”