Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 19, 2026, 06:24:22 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 179349
  • Total Topics: 1495
  • Online Today: 417
  • Online Ever: 4316
  • (October 16, 2025, 04:40:42 PM)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 220
Total: 222

UT Rio Grande

  • 101 Replies
  • 11281 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12308
  • +238/-2977
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #90 on: November 28, 2021, 12:41:58 AM »
Remove Kofi and that’s the exact outlook.  With Kofi, could still happen.

But really with the transfer portal and college free agency, Underwood is a GM at this point tasked to build a different competitive team year to year.  It’s too early to say how he will do. 

I feel like Underwood is looked at like he’s some Theo Epstein of the Cubs right now and he should not have that type of respect

This take is fucking idiotic. The very fact that Kofi is here has made it borderline impossible to get someone anywhere near his caliber to replace him. No elite big wanted to come here knowing he’s going to sit behind Kofi indefinitely. We were still in late on several immediate impact bigs that went elsewhere while he hemmed and hawed around last spring and summer. The same shit will likely happen after this season. Although if the season plays out the way it’s currently looking, he may leave regardless of whatever money he’s making at UI.

Literally no one thinks this is a Theo Epstein-esque situation. That’s a shitty straw man, even by your standards. Brad Underwood elevated this program to a once-every-15-years-if-we-are-lucky high in his first four years. That’s the objective truth.

Is there room for improvement? Of course.
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 39786
  • +1066/-1054
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #91 on: November 28, 2021, 04:48:54 AM »
I think it’s totally fair not to like the dude and I think it’s fair to some degree to criticize him for certain in-game decisions.  But the people here acting like he should be anywhere near the hot seat are crazy.  At this point we’d have to miss the tournament this year and next year to even consider firing him in that span, IMO.  We’re recruiting pretty well too, not elite but we’re stacking solid classes and I think that’s how you build a program.

Agreed. If he were recruiting like 2006 Bruce Weber, I’d still be shouting about red flags. His incoming recruits look to be high major/tournament quality, and there’s a good chance he’ll add to it.
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 39786
  • +1066/-1054
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #92 on: November 28, 2021, 04:50:16 AM »
This take is fucking idiotic. The very fact that Kofi is here has made it borderline impossible to get someone anywhere near his caliber to replace him. No elite big wanted to come here knowing he’s going to sit behind Kofi indefinitely. We were still in late on several immediate impact bigs that went elsewhere while he hemmed and hawed around last spring and summer. The same shit will likely happen after this season. Although if the season plays out the way it’s currently looking, he may leave regardless of whatever money he’s making at UI.

Literally no one thinks this is a Theo Epstein-esque situation. That’s a shitty straw man, even by your standards. Brad Underwood elevated this program to a once-every-15-years-if-we-are-lucky high in his first four years. That’s the objective truth.

Is there room for improvement? Of course.
.

Let us not forget the day I agreed with Custard.
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

The_Truth

  • ***
  • 166
  • +1/-65535
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #93 on: November 28, 2021, 07:22:13 AM »
The_Truth just doesn’t write the way Truth writes. And the post above has zero intellectual honesty in it. There’s nothing similar to Groce/Weber and Underwood’s trajectories other than none of them won a title.

Dominic posts the way Truth posts, but Truth is usually fairly intellectually honest, which is precisely why he got so many peoples’ goats.

This Dominic was intellectually dishonest in the post about Kofi. Brad hired both of the guys that got the players that were primarily responsible for us turning the corner…and almost all the other players that helped us turn the corner.

Antigua and Chin left, Brad took his time selecting replacements, and then put together a top 20 recruiting class in a few months, which they’ll certainly add to in the spring.

The truth is a good coach with a stacked team wouldn’t have lost to the University of Chicago institute for the blind…

Now back to Weber lover and his custard…

*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12308
  • +238/-2977
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #94 on: November 28, 2021, 08:48:19 AM »
The truth is a good coach with a stacked team wouldn’t have lost to the University of Chicago institute for the blind…

Now back to Weber lover and his custard…

I mean, you do realize Loyola was top 20 AP, top 10 KenPom, and #1 KenPom defense coming into the game, right? They were one the most underseeded teams in the history of the tournament. The only thing missing was a big name. We can pretend they were the Little Sisters of The Poor, but there we go being intellectually dishonest again.
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 31721
  • +609/-2440
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #95 on: November 28, 2021, 08:51:13 AM »
I mean, you do realize Loyola was top 20 AP, top 10 KenPom, and #1 KenPom defense coming into the game, right? They were one the most underseeded teams in the history of the tournament. The only thing missing was a big name. We can pretend they were the Little Sisters of The Poor, but there we go being intellectually dishonest again.

And they got completely demolished after they
completely demolished Illinois.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12308
  • +238/-2977
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #96 on: November 28, 2021, 09:12:08 AM »
And they got completely demolished after they
completely demolished Illinois.

No, they actually didn’t, but ok.

Oregon St had only 3 points almost 10 mins into the game.

It was a 4 point game with 1:10 left before OSU hit a contested three to put it away.

And OSU was a solid team in March. They won the PAC tourney, and the PAC showed really well in the NCAA tourney. They made it to the round of eight by beating dark horse #11 Oklahoma State, #17 Loyola, and #27 Tennessee. They obviously weren’t trash.
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 31721
  • +609/-2440
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #97 on: November 28, 2021, 09:23:41 AM »
No, they actually didn’t, but ok.

Oregon St had only 3 points almost 10 mins into the game.

It was a 4 point game with 1:10 left before OSU hit a contested three to put it away.

And OSU was a solid team in March. They won the PAC tourney, and the PAC showed really well in the NCAA tourney. They made it to the round of eight by beating dark horse #11 Oklahoma State, #17 Loyola, and #27 Tennessee. They obviously weren’t trash.

They were up double digits in the 2d half.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 31721
  • +609/-2440
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #98 on: November 28, 2021, 09:24:21 AM »
But it is a moot point anyway. Underachiever isn't going anywhere.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

The_Truth

  • ***
  • 166
  • +1/-65535
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #99 on: November 28, 2021, 12:19:09 PM »
I mean, you do realize Loyola was top 20 AP, top 10 KenPom, and #1 KenPom defense coming into the game, right? They were one the most underseeded teams in the history of the tournament. The only thing missing was a big name. We can pretend they were the Little Sisters of The Poor, but there we go being intellectually dishonest again.

You’re right…I’m being so intellectually dishonest that an unranked perennial PAC 12 bottom feeder beat that same Kenpom behemoth convincingly in the next round…

Is Underwood better than groce/Weber? Sure…but again that’s comparing cowdung to more cowdung…he ain’t no Bill Self…

The way we lost to Marquette and then Cincy and then taking Texas High School to the wire is an embarrassment period no matter how many different ways you spin your love for coach Underwhelm…

Now back to Custard and his illogical thinking…

*

Dominic

  • *****
  • 1605
  • +2/-65535
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #100 on: November 28, 2021, 12:59:39 PM »
Brad Underwood elevated this program to a once-every-15-years-if-we-are-lucky high in his first four years. That’s the objective truth.


But again, you have to break down exactly what it took to do that. Kofi.  That’s the difference.  Is getting another Kofi repeatable? For Underwood, I don’t think it is. I don’t think it’s Underwood system that created a #1 seed.  It was Kofi.

Purdue fans have confidence in Matt Painter that he can churn talent over and over again and still be a good team bc he has a system in place and has has plenty of good teams cycle thru from Hummell/Moore/Johnson to Swanigan to Carson Edwards and now his current group.

I don’t think anyone should be confident in Underwood.  Right now, he’s similar to Frank Martin at South Carolina, except Frank got to the Final 4 and Underwood has won 1 ncaa game in 4 years.


*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9343
  • +625/-2096
    • View Profile
Re: UT Rio Grande
« Reply #101 on: November 28, 2021, 02:28:22 PM »
Interesting thing about Painter is he mostly wins with fair to middling recruiting. One top 10 (2007) and one top 25 (2012) class in 17 years.

Brad Underwood will have 4 top 25 classes in 6 years. Kofi's class  was not one of them. Starting with 2017: 30 25 69 16 23 18

Painter starting with 2006: 55 5 291 287 37 92 16 28 33 37 108 34 49 58 36 38 26
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”