And yet zilch happened until those meddling kids got involved. Unsure how that proves "peer review" worked in this matter. Oh, that is because it didn't.
We all recognize that the processes for ferreting out the manipulation of research data are not perfect.
From the November 2022 article:
"The EMBO Journal wrote in a public post last week that it is reviewing the allegations regarding a 2008 paper about receptors within the brain for which Tessier-Lavigne is listed as the third author of 11. 'The EMBO Journal is aware of these issues and is looking into this,' the journal wrote. Facundo Batista, EMBO’s editor-in-chief, confirmed the investigation in emails with The Daily, writing that the journal has already 'evaluated' the issues raised on PubPeer and 'as a consequence' is “currently engaged in a full due diligence screen.'”
"Since 2011, EMBO has employed a data integrity analyst, who analyzes all papers before publication. Public allegations first raised on PubPeer in 2018 have brought the 2008 paper to EMBO’s attention."
"The public acknowledgement marks a rare step for EMBO, which is regularly rated among the top journals of its field by Scimago Journal Rankings and receives almost 3,000 submissions per year. The journal has retracted papers based on PubPeer allegations without first publicly acknowledging an ongoing investigation."