The people in New Zealand are were locked down, wearing masks, etc...
They have COVID under control, and now they are not locked down nor wearing masks.
Is this some corner case example where a non-authoritarian regime took freedoms away, then gave them back because they are not authoritarian?
But the California government is authoritarian, so we will be wearing masks and never go to a bar again?
I wonder, when the US had rationing coupons for butter and gasoline during WW2, was that a freedom being taken away by an authoritarian regime? What happened there, Ike got elected and overthrew the authoritarianism of Trumanism?
I am an American…I have rights! Those masks mandates violate my First Amendment right to speech and association, and mandatory masks violate my constitutional right to liberty and to make decisions about my own health.
My body, my choice!
Well, maybe not…
“On July 27, the [Palm Beach County, FL] Court declined to issue an injunction against the mask mandate. Citing Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, the Court found that ‘no constitutional right is infringed by the Mask Ordinance’s mandate … and that the requirement to swear such a covering has a clear rational basis based on the protection of public health.’ More to the point, the Court continued, ‘constitutional rights and the ideals of limited government do not … allow (citizens) to wholly shirk their social obligation to their fellow Americans or to society as a whole…. After all, we do not have a constitutional right to infect others.’”
https://theconversation.com/the-constitution-doesnt-have-a-problem-with-mask-mandates-142335