The conclusions are still relevant. The science is still evolving as we learn more. The answer may be somewhere in the middle.
It doesn't change the bottom line for me: preventing severe illness and hospitalization was the primary goal for taking the vaccine. And I knew that if I became infected, I would stay home. That's still the case today.
Nonetheless, your decision to get vaccinated appears to be a personal choice.
That is quite a bit different than vaccine mandates with respect to maintaining employment, which the court case mentioned earlier was about.
The CDC changed the definition of "vaccination" entirely in Sept 2021 from providing "immunity" to providing "protection".
The "immunity" descriptive no longer fit the mandated "vaccine" yet the LAUSD mandate didn't end until Sept 2023.