* *

User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 05, 2026, 02:55:59 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Stats

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 178772
  • Total Topics: 1489
  • Online Today: 247
  • Online Ever: 4316
  • (October 16, 2025, 04:40:42 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 92
Total: 92

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Down

Work bathrooms

  • 76 Replies
  • 10480 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 39620
  • +1057/-1050
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: Work bathrooms
« Reply #75 on: January 08, 2026, 05:43:28 PM »
Quote from: murphstahoe on January 08, 2026, 03:05:43 PM
CC&7 like any self respecting New Holland resident

Good drink. Loved these and 7&7s back in the day
Logged
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.
*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 31597
  • +607/-2434
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: Work bathrooms
« Reply #76 on: March 16, 2026, 03:59:07 PM »
I will cut to the meat of this 2/26/26 EEOC decision....

www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2026-02/2025003976.pdf

Quote
Our decision, however, applies only to federal agencies subject to the E.E.O.C.’s administrative complaint process for federal employees. It does not apply to any other type of employer, including private sector employers. And our decision does not bind any federal court. 

Quote
In 2015, a majority of the E.E.O.C.’s then- Commissioners held federal agencies “must allow [trans-identifying employees] access to the . . . [opposite sex] restroom.” Lusardi v. Dep’t of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120133395, 2015 WL 1607756, at *8 (Apr. 1, 2015).

Quote
Having established that under Title VII employers may in general maintain single-sex bathrooms and similar intimate spaces, we ask whether the statute would compel them to make a specific exception for trans-identifying employees. We think no. 

Quote
Within the EEOC’s administrative complaint process, that an employee is excluded from an opposite sex bathroom or similar intimate space does not by itself state a plausible claim for relief under Title VII.

If Jasn works for a federal agency, Judge Judy should be contacted to watch the bathroom entrances.
Logged
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Up
« previous next »