Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 12, 2026, 10:31:19 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 180321
  • Total Topics: 1496
  • Online Today: 270
  • Online Ever: 4316
  • (October 16, 2025, 04:40:42 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 178
Total: 178

No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!

  • 1154 Replies
  • 29225 Views

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40168
  • +1079/-1068
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #210 on: March 09, 2026, 11:21:33 PM »
Trump could say no, but why would he, he benefits in so many ways.
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12338
  • +238/-2989
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #211 on: March 09, 2026, 11:46:33 PM »
Yeah I would definitely trust some Irish economist dude on Twitter citing an anonymous source about Israel’s war plans. FFS this guy is throwing shit against the wall and seeing what sticks. It’s pure engagement farming.

Iran’s domestic defenses have been decimated and their ability to respond greatly diminished. Shocker, this isn’t really being reported on in Tempo’s algorithm.

The entire NYT email this morning was negative reporting about the conflict or whatever the fuck you want to call it.   100% negative with a ton of suppositions and fear porn with absolutely no mention of strategic victories against Iran’s defenses, what it might mean for the Middle East or the West writ large, etc. Not a word.

At this point they clearly only see this as fuel for the midterm fire, at the expense of basically shilling for Iran. Wild times.

This dude’s Twotter is an AI TDS fever dream that Robb would be proud of.

https://x.com/philippilk?s=21
« Last Edit: March 09, 2026, 11:49:02 PM by Custard »
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40168
  • +1079/-1068
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #212 on: March 10, 2026, 07:42:56 AM »
I can’t speak for certain what anyone’s war plans are or aren’t, all I am doing is sharing what’s being reported. I have heard it reported that Israel and the U.S. would like to wrap this up sooner, rather than later. And why wouldn’t they? It makes sense. It costs a lot of money to be there, and it’s disrupting markets; which we know matters to rich people.
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40168
  • +1079/-1068
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #213 on: March 10, 2026, 07:47:04 AM »
Funny that Custard talks about how much ass we’re kicking isn’t reported in my “algorithm.” I’ll bet his algorithm is the Pete Kegsbreath algorithm. “We’re kicking ass, and we’re staying’!”

I’m well aware that we’ve done significant damage to Iran, what a fuckstick.
"He commented more than once that, 'You know, Hitler did some good things, too,'" Kelly recalled to The Times. Kelly said he would usually quash the conversation by saying "nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good," but that Trump would occasionally bring up the topic again.

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32010
  • +609/-2452
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #214 on: March 10, 2026, 07:48:30 AM »
I can’t speak for certain what anyone’s war plans are or aren’t, all I am doing is sharing what’s being reported. I have heard it reported that Israel and the U.S. would like to wrap this up sooner, rather than later. And why wouldn’t they? It makes sense. It costs a lot of money to be there, and it’s disrupting markets; which we know matters to rich people.

Reported by whom? May want to vet your sources.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32010
  • +609/-2452
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #215 on: March 10, 2026, 07:49:44 AM »
Funny that Custard talks about how much ass we’re kicking isn’t reported in my “algorithm.” I’ll bet his algorithm is the Pete Kegsbreath algorithm. “We’re kicking ass, and we’re staying’!”

I’m well aware that we’ve done significant damage to Iran, what a fuckstick.

You appear to be upset.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32010
  • +609/-2452
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #216 on: March 10, 2026, 07:52:34 AM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/that-video-of-epstein-and-trump-it-might-be-pro-iran-disinformation/ar-AA1XTmVF

That video of Epstein and Trump? It might be pro-Iran disinformation.

The video is indeed fake, disinformation researchers say. And the account is part of a pro-Iran propaganda network that has found viral success by tapping into the conspiracy theory that Trump attacked Iran to distract the public from the Epstein files.

These guys on Tempo's algorithm?
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 12751
  • +179/-2630
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #217 on: March 10, 2026, 08:35:53 AM »
Yeah I would definitely trust some Irish economist dude on Twitter citing an anonymous source about Israel’s war plans. FFS this guy is throwing shit against the wall and seeing what sticks. It’s pure engagement farming.

Iran’s domestic defenses have been decimated and their ability to respond greatly diminished. Shocker, this isn’t really being reported on in Tempo’s algorithm.

The entire NYT email this morning was negative reporting about the conflict or whatever the fuck you want to call it.   100% negative with a ton of suppositions and fear porn with absolutely no mention of strategic victories against Iran’s defenses, what it might mean for the Middle East or the West writ large, etc. Not a word.

At this point they clearly only see this as fuel for the midterm fire, at the expense of basically shilling for Iran. Wild times.

This dude’s Twotter is an AI TDS fever dream that Robb would be proud of.

https://x.com/philippilk?s=21
The Twotter dude is apparently including comments from David Ignatius.
Ignatius doesn't name the official who "requested anonimity".

Let me guess, other media organizations ran the same story from an anonymous source.
I'm guessing also that finding an anonymous source who will disagree with an administration's efforts is really not that difficult.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2026, 08:38:44 AM by Somewhere in Mn »
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of ommision.

*

Judge Judy

  • *****
  • 11937
  • +120/-1813
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #218 on: March 10, 2026, 08:49:39 AM »
You appear to be upset.

Which I would expect from someone like him when America is kicking Iran’s ass. Especially when it’s Trump doing it. Those Progressives don’t like that kind of stuff. They want us to lose and America destroyed. They’ve literally took the other side in every possible instance. It’s disturbing, but not surprising. Contrary to what Tempo thinks, even throwing money at their candidates isn’t gonna get those American haters elected…
Because FOX News told me so…

HQ2 Cesspool March Madness champion 🏆

*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12338
  • +238/-2989
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #219 on: March 10, 2026, 08:57:30 AM »
The Twotter dude is apparently including comments from David Ignatius.
Ignatius doesn't name the official who "requested anonimity".

Let me guess, other media organizations ran the same story from an anonymous source.
I'm guessing also that finding an anonymous source who will disagree with an administration's efforts is really not that difficult.

Exactly. Make some stuff up that you want to go viral, attribute it to an anonymous source or sources close to the situation who are not authorized to comment on it, and presto.
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 12751
  • +179/-2630
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #220 on: March 10, 2026, 09:26:19 AM »
Exactly. Make some stuff up that you want to go viral, attribute it to an anonymous source or sources close to the situation who are not authorized to comment on it, and presto.
This may be an example of what Nancy Pelosi termed "a wrap around smear."
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of ommision.

*

murphstahoe

  • *****
  • 8340
  • +2016/-143
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #221 on: March 10, 2026, 12:29:25 PM »
Iran’s domestic defenses have been decimated and their ability to respond greatly diminished. Shocker, this isn’t really being reported on in Tempo’s algorithm.

19 random dudes with a couple million bucks destroyed the World Trade Center. We're just lucky that the Iranians aren't creative or evil enough to really mess with us.

Fentanyl in the water supply? Take out a random set of transmission towers across the US? I mean, you could do millions of dollars in damage to the US economy just by sending guys out to run out of gas on the highway at rush hour in random places on a daily basis.

*

murphstahoe

  • *****
  • 8340
  • +2016/-143
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #222 on: March 10, 2026, 12:32:33 PM »
Which I would expect from someone like him when America is kicking Iran’s ass. Especially when it’s Trump doing it. Those Progressives don’t like that kind of stuff. They want us to lose and America destroyed. They’ve literally took the other side in every possible instance. It’s disturbing, but not surprising. Contrary to what Tempo thinks, even throwing money at their candidates isn’t gonna get those American haters elected…

What do we win? This isn't "TOTTM". It's not a game. If we go over there and kick their ass, but gas goes up by 50 cents a gallon - we LOSE. Guess what, gas has gone up by 50 cents a gallon. That has huge implications to the US Economy, both short and long term. I don't want that. Apparently you do.

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32010
  • +609/-2452
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #223 on: March 10, 2026, 12:36:03 PM »
19 random dudes with a couple million bucks destroyed the World Trade Center. We're just lucky that the Iranians aren't creative or evil enough to really mess with us.

Fentanyl in the water supply? Take out a random set of transmission towers across the US? I mean, you could do millions of dollars in damage to the US economy just by sending guys out to run out of gas on the highway at rush hour in random places on a daily basis.

You don't believe the Ayatollahs over there have thought about this stuff? Allegedly there are sleeper cells here. No clue what they are waiting for if they are actually here.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32010
  • +609/-2452
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: No New Wars! Well, maybe some new wars. OK, we LOVE war!
« Reply #224 on: March 10, 2026, 12:36:49 PM »
What do we win? This isn't "TOTTM". It's not a game. If we go over there and kick their ass, but gas goes up by 50 cents a gallon - we LOSE. Guess what, gas has gone up by 50 cents a gallon. That has huge implications to the US Economy, both short and long term. I don't want that. Apparently you do.

Good argument for electric cars and trucks. Run with that....
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"