* *

User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 01, 2026, 08:22:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Stats

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 184092
  • Total Topics: 1520
  • Online Today: 375
  • Online Ever: 8243
  • (July 10, 2026, 02:18:36 PM)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 364
Total: 366

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 24   Go Down

Stonks

  • 347 Replies
  • 49272 Views

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13110
  • +179/-2709
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #285 on: June 28, 2025, 08:53:10 AM »
Quote from: Custard on June 28, 2025, 08:42:18 AM
Watched a short piece from Victor Davis Hanson last night about how Iran is hated the world over, but of the very few groups on earth that support them right now are American Democrats/Progressives.

It’s absolutely amazing how Trump has most of the left rabidly supporting deeply unpopular overall political positions, including openly wishcasting that the air strikes to limit Iran’s ability to build nuclear weapons weren’t successful.

No one here really knows how effective the strikes were, but there has definitely been an eagerness from the American left to embrace Iranian reports that the bombs didn’t do anything. These people won’t give Trump a W no matter what he does, even when it’s something that very clearly benefits America/the world.

These people are ideologically captured and cannot be trusted. Luckily they have the Democrat party so crippled that the midterms should be a walk in the park and the good guys can continue to rid our country (and the world) of the criminal scum that Obama3 let run rampant during his 4 year snooze.
Be careful what you think about the midterms.
The assessment was a preliminary and low-confidence leak. Hopefully, but it won't happen, they'll ID the leaker.
Nonetheless, Iran came to the peace table. I'm not sure they're doing that over a minor setback.
Logged
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.
*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12640
  • +239/-3070
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #286 on: June 28, 2025, 08:59:22 AM »
Quote from: No one in Mn on June 28, 2025, 08:53:10 AM

Nonetheless, Iran came to the peace table. I'm not sure they're doing that over a minor setback.

Well and people act like we couldn’t just do it again if we wanted.
Logged
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo
*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13110
  • +179/-2709
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #287 on: June 28, 2025, 09:00:07 AM »
Logged
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.
*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32969
  • +619/-2489
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #288 on: June 28, 2025, 09:00:11 AM »
Quote from: No one in Mn on June 28, 2025, 06:38:03 AM
"Nike soared 15.2% for the biggest gain in the market"
The fishwrap June 28, 2025

Good for Nike, Vietnam and Jobu's 401k, I guess. Not good for the deficit that appears to only matter when a Democrat is in charge.
Logged
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"
*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9682
  • +650/-2123
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #289 on: June 28, 2025, 09:02:50 AM »
Quote
"The entire operation was precisely planned and brilliantly executed, even if it remains unclear whether the Iranian nuclear infrastructure was eradicated or just damaged."

Reaction: why do you hate Trump?
Logged
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”
*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13110
  • +179/-2709
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #290 on: June 28, 2025, 09:04:57 AM »
Quote from: illiniray on June 28, 2025, 09:02:50 AM
Reaction: why do you hate Trump?
Why do you believe Bertrand ?
Logged
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.
*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9682
  • +650/-2123
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #291 on: June 28, 2025, 09:06:23 AM »
Quote from: Custard on June 28, 2025, 08:59:22 AM
Well and people act like we couldn’t just do it again if we wanted.

Bomb them back to the stone age again?

Are you going to call me an Iraq lover again? I have been called similar things in the past.
Logged
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”
*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32969
  • +619/-2489
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #292 on: June 28, 2025, 09:06:44 AM »
Quote from: Custard on June 28, 2025, 08:47:12 AM

Bingo.

Politics. Never seen anyone act like this in the past 4 years when Jill was president. There is also no gambling in Casablanca. Shocking!
Logged
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"
*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9682
  • +650/-2123
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #293 on: June 28, 2025, 09:08:51 AM »
Quote from: No one in Mn on June 28, 2025, 09:04:57 AM
Why do you believe Bertrand ?

Who is that? It appears to have been a well executed strike with uncertain results as of now.
Logged
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”
*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32969
  • +619/-2489
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #294 on: June 28, 2025, 09:09:17 AM »
Quote from: No one in Mn on June 28, 2025, 09:00:07 AM
Bango, bongo.
 ;D ;D ;D ;D




If Biden officials believed it was credible it must be wrong, since they were wrong on everything else I hear. So natural origin it is.
Logged
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"
*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32969
  • +619/-2489
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #295 on: June 28, 2025, 09:10:46 AM »
Quote from: illiniray on June 28, 2025, 09:06:23 AM
Bomb them back to the stone age again?

Are you going to call me an Iraq lover again? I have been called similar things in the past.

If you cry like Ketel Marte, Mn will be banned from all message boards.
Logged
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"
*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9682
  • +650/-2123
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #296 on: June 28, 2025, 09:15:39 AM »
From Steele, to Hunter, to Israel, to ...

Weird.
Logged
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”
*

Custard

  • *****
  • 12640
  • +239/-3070
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #297 on: June 28, 2025, 09:24:06 AM »
Quote from: illiniray on June 28, 2025, 09:06:23 AM
Bomb them back to the stone age again?

Are you going to call me an Iraq lover again? I have been called similar things in the past.

I mean, if the first strikes actually weren’t as effective as they wanted, then yeah. If this can foster a lasting peace and nuclear deterrence, then it will be worth it even if it didn’t completely destroy the enrichment facilities. But I think we have all been around long enough to know this wasn’t so much about the facilities themselves so much as a show of power.

I probably won’t call you an Iraq lover, but you definitely were Biden’s Baghdad Bob!
Logged
Poster Boy for White Male Indifference

AOTC on basically everything measurable

“Custard, you were RIGHT!” -Tempo
*

illiniray

  • *****
  • 9682
  • +650/-2123
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #298 on: June 28, 2025, 09:28:27 AM »
Quote from: Custard on June 28, 2025, 09:24:06 AM
I mean, if the first strikes actually weren’t as effective as they wanted, then yeah. If this can foster a lasting peace and nuclear deterrence, then it will be worth it even if it didn’t completely destroy the enrichment facilities. But I think we have all been around long enough to know this wasn’t so much about the facilities themselves so much as a show of power.

I probably won’t call you an Iraq lover, but you definitely were Biden’s Baghdad Bob!

You seem to be projecting. You said Trump bombed Iraq back to the stone age. That made me choke on my coffee.
Logged
“Taking a trip? Where to?”  -“Wherever I end up, I guess. -“Man, I wish I was you." -Well, hang in there.”
*

No one in Mn

  • *****
  • 13110
  • +179/-2709
    • View Profile
Re: Stonks
« Reply #299 on: June 28, 2025, 09:31:54 AM »
Quote from: illiniray on June 28, 2025, 09:15:39 AM
From Steele, to Hunter, to Israel, to ...

Weird.
You forgot covid origin, and they're all from "Who is that ?"

As well as .....
"Exclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say
By Natasha Bertrand, Katie Bo Lillis and Zachary Cohen, CNN
"The assessment, which has not been previously reported, ........"
Logged
Still hiding behind innuendo and practicing the art of omission.
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 24   Go Up
« previous next »