In the Wisco example, it appears that Maistelman agrees with the election commission position rather than the legislature.
The election commission also may have enabled up to 200,000 to avoid id laws.
The courts can decide.
In the Pa example and the AG.
This guy thinks the courts need not get involved ? lol.
From before the election.

What, exactly, are the courts deciding? If the State of Wisconsin says a ballot is valid and the state waived any issue with the ID law, who even has standing to challenge that? And why would it matter? No one is damaged by people exercising the right to vote. And it's all likely moot anyway.
If the court has the power to second-guess the executive branch and invalidate ballots, it has the power to fashion far simpler and more equitable remedies that don't needlessly threaten Constitutional interests on multiple fronts.
There's just nothing here and you're being grifted.