0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.
Of course, there are no guarantees. But I’ve said all along, I continue to trade down in the draft and take advantage of the gift that keeps on giving to build up the roster. I think Fields is plenty good enough to win with a stronger roster around him. If we had Jalen Hurts, I’d guess there’d be just as strong of a movement to get rid of him had he had the same path as Justin. Spark likes to make fun of the “no pro bowls” meme, but it’s factual. Count the number of pro bowl appearances on any good offense and it’s probably 10-20 more than the Bears, which still stands at 0.
The guy some people have called our “best offensive lineman,” showed that yesterday maybe he isn’t good enough, though I choose to believe he “just had a bad day.” Much like Brock Purdy at Cleveland.
Except I said that about you, who was being especially battered for bad takes that day, and not Purdy.
You are betting on, and guaranteeing, there being QBs in later years better than the ones in this year's draft.
You clearly weren’t. I have the text receipts to prove it.
I’m not convinced there are any can’t miss quarterbacks in this draft. IMO the safest pick might be Penix, and I said I’d be fairly fired up about it if the Bears drafted him.
Trevor Lawrence was about as “can’t miss” as anyone since Luck. If Jacksonville had the 1st pick, they’d absolutely be having the same conversation (not that he hasn’t been better than Justin, he has), but he hasn’t looked “generational,” and I wouldn’t call him a top 5-8 quarterback.
Yes, I was. I have the text receipts to prove it as well.
Penix is what, 24, and had 2 ACLs?
As long as he passes the physicals, IDK. Ok, so if he’s the franchise he’s the franchise for 8 years instead of 12. Who cares?
You are almost certainly not talking about me. As I would guess you’d say every day is a bad day for me here. You were pretty clearly talking about Purdy.