Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 07, 2026, 07:56:16 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent

Members
  • Total Members: 142
  • Latest: Hal9000
Stats
  • Total Posts: 182626
  • Total Topics: 1507
  • Online Today: 144
  • Online Ever: 8243
  • (July 10, 2026, 02:18:36 PM)
Users Online
Users: 1
Guests: 114
Total: 115

THE JFC Thread!

  • 6279 Replies
  • 724989 Views

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3645 on: January 08, 2024, 03:36:44 PM »
They have a competent passer throwing them the ball.  That tends to help a WR.

We don’t have anyone other than DJ who can catch a contested ball. And we don’t have WRs making moves like this. Wicks also left Terrell Smith in his wake on that first touchdown. This dude is like their #4 or 5 receiver.

https://x.com/jacobmorley/status/1744204783479664743?s=46&t=taZJ_d5ITWr6Hq3PUZDUiQ


“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Judge Judy

  • *****
  • 11945
  • +121/-1817
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3648 on: January 08, 2024, 03:38:44 PM »
Would you trade Justin Fields for Jordan Love?

I’ve already asked this…
Because FOX News told me so…

HQ2 Cesspool March Madness champion 🏆

*

spark mandrill

  • *****
  • 4043
  • +312/-40
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3649 on: January 08, 2024, 03:40:11 PM »
Man, we just can’t compete with the Packers’ elite pass catchers (with probably their top two guys on the bench).  Definitely couldn’t be QB play.

Can’t make it up man, just really insane defensive shit.

As the old adage goes, if you’ve got elite receivers it doesn’t matter who is at QB.  Credible football minds all agree on that.

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3650 on: January 08, 2024, 03:42:40 PM »
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3651 on: January 08, 2024, 03:43:43 PM »
Man, we just can’t compete with the Packers’ elite pass catchers (with probably their top two guys on the bench).  Definitely couldn’t be QB play.

Can’t make it up man, just really insane defensive shit.

As the old adage goes, if you’ve got elite receivers it doesn’t matter who is at QB.  Credible football minds all agree on that.

I clearly said the quarterback play was good. The WR play is also very good.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3652 on: January 08, 2024, 03:45:38 PM »
And the coaching is very good.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3653 on: January 08, 2024, 03:46:47 PM »
Would you trade Justin Fields for Jordan Love?

Perhaps. I also strongly question if Jordan Love is playing at this level if he’s had the same path as JF.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3654 on: January 08, 2024, 03:52:52 PM »
It’s the one logical approach that is based in the actual production and results and not some hope that if you build an absolutely perfect roster you can figure out the most important part at the end.

We saw yesterday that good QB play + no name mediocre receivers can torch you in the NFL. And even though the Bears pass catchers are better, they couldn’t move the ball through the air.



Did you just say the Bears receivers are better? I’ll give you DJ. But after that…

Also, building the roster first is exactly how SF, KC, Philly, and largely Baltimore have done it.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3655 on: January 08, 2024, 03:55:01 PM »
Well at their best they’re certainly worse than DJ Moore, and the decent ones didn’t play.

His top receivers yesterday were Jayden Reed (a 2nd round rookie), Dontayvion Wicks (a 5th round rookie) and Bo Melton (a 7th rounder who spent last year on the Seattle practice squad).

Sell that as a murderer’s row if you’d like but I doubt anyone would trade the Bears’ WR corps for those three.

And 2nd and 3rd round TEs. And Aaron Jones. And better coaching and play-calling.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3656 on: January 08, 2024, 03:56:45 PM »
Pretty sure I’d take Doubs over Mooney. And he didn’t even record a catch.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3657 on: January 08, 2024, 04:05:47 PM »
Unlike Bob Tonyan (who GB let go) and Tyler Scott, I’m pretty sure GBs receivers catch two perfectly thrown deep balls that would have had the Bears playing for the division title yesterday with a Lions loss.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth

*

ThePAMan

  • *****
  • 32582
  • +617/-2483
  • Because "PussyMan" and "PenisMan" were trademarked
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3658 on: January 08, 2024, 04:18:46 PM »
No, it hasn’t. My stance all along has been continue to build the 53 man roster and then find the quarterback if need be. I am also totally on board with using a top 10 pick to draft someone (a QB). I would keep fields as well. I don’t necessarily feel the need to draft someone at one because I think that capital is better. Spent getting multiple high pics. And then, yes, the bust rate on top picks is pretty high.

You have argued that none of the guys are guaranteed to be as good as Fields. Which is as dumb a thing as has ever been uttered. But the FFS are morons.
Mark Carman: "The Whitlock!...Caleb Williams failed Wayne Whitlock." Been told I need to take my dick out my mouth so maybe I "wont [sic] sound like such a fucking faggot all the time[.]"

Tempo: "PAMan is a pot stirrer and agent provocateur"

*

Reacher

  • *****
  • 40860
  • +1099/-1094
  • You should see my passer rating
    • View Profile
Re: THE JFC Thread!
« Reply #3659 on: January 08, 2024, 05:32:21 PM »
Of course, there are no guarantees. But I’ve said all along, I continue to trade down in the draft and take advantage of the gift that keeps on giving to build up the roster. I think Fields is plenty good enough to win with a stronger roster around him. If we had Jalen Hurts, I’d guess there’d be just as strong of a movement to get rid of him had he had the same path as Justin.

Spark likes to make fun of the “no pro bowls” meme, but it’s factual. Count the number of pro bowl appearances on any good offense and it’s probably 10-20 more than the Bears, which still stands at 0.
“These are lawyers! That’s Latin for liar.” - Gob Bluth