Another example of your weird defensiveness of Fields:
At one point he made a bad throw, and you pointed it out calling it "terrible". I responded by saying yeah, but they've been rare enough.
Then a few plays later he made an unreal escape. I said "Another unreal escape from Fields".
Then you said something out and I said "that was the bad and the good of Fields back to back" - I didn't expect that to be a controversial statement whatsoever, after all you'd already called the throw "terrible" and I'd defended him; and I'd already lauded the unreal escape he'd made. But no, you went on full defense mode about how I "can't even acknowledge the great play he made without also pointing out the bad one," and just totally ignored that I HAD acknowledged the great play he made without pointing out the bad one.