Of course, I posted his opinion because it agreed with mine. Should I post the opinions of people who disagree with me? WTF kind of point is that? All I ever tried to to convey to you is that there are people who aren’t football stupid who disagree with you. As if I would cite someone who agrees with you and disagrees with me? JFC what are we doing here?
You JUST tried to invalidate my opinion because I liked Trubisky after he led the Bears to the playoffs. But when Aikman did it, you didn’t question his credibility at all - in fact you sarcastically asked if I thought it meant he was infallible.
The only determining factor to you in terms of “credibility” is that someone agrees with your view on a topic. That’s it. If they don’t - even if they self evidently are far more credible than you - you will say outright that you are more credible.
I’ll acknowledge Troy Aikman is credible even though he was wrong about the past QBs. The NFL GMs who disagree with you are credible too, maybe even more credible than Aikman, but you don’t put the same weight on their opinions (because they disagree with you. Brad Biggs is infinitely more credible than you in terms of having visibility into the Bears’ FO but you point out he was wrong about something last year (he’s not infallible) and he disagrees with you, so you are more credible.
It’s just so transparent. Credibility isn’t determined by whether someone agrees with your opinion.