Total Members Voted: 16
Voting closed: November 15, 2023, 04:52:09 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Typical from you. Tempo: “Water is wet.” Mn: “You sure about that?”
Hypothetical for those willing to answer it (guessing JusgeJudy is the only one who will offer a sincere answer): If Fields manages to play well at Detroit this weekend; let’s say 270 yards 2 touchdowns no turnovers, runs for another 50+ and a TD AND WINS is that something along with solid play the rest of the year make you willing to keep him?
I thought that was a reasonable question.
Do you want specific numbers? I think we all know “good quarterbacking” when we see it. Good to great production. Turnovers at a reasonable level. Maybe even a few wins sprinkled in. Good play in critical situations. How would you like it defined? We all just know it when we see it.
Isn't a QB rating in the 99s or higher deemed acceptable these days?
He needs to start showing more. The next 4 games should answer some questions.
99s?
99.1 to 99.9. Or is it over 100 these days,
He was “showing more” 2 of his last three starts. Somewhere between his bad play and that (and closer to that) should be sufficient.
One game, a loss at home, was against a team that limped into Chicago and was not playing well and had given up 70 the week before. The other was the equivalent of a qb salivating at the thought of throwing against our defense. But were not dead last in pass defense like Washington is.Or does having one of the worst defenses in the league argument only come into play when discussing the Bears giving up points and how that impacts Fields record ? Hang a banner or two.